Re: Protected Class Members
Posted by KHYF on 4/08/05
Pat, Mary has a point about conciseness and brevity; still, it is hard to do this when you are suffering, I know from experience. You must focus your rage into a constructive venue. Collect as much verifiable and tangible evidence as possible, write your story, include comments on the evidence that you can prove, edit it rigorously, and then when a proper venue appears, you will be prepared. Media, State Health Dept., School Boards, local politicians, etc... are the obvious places, perhaps you can think of others...union hall, etc..??? Know how you feel. On 4/07/05, Pat wrote: > Do you know of any other websites where a person can post comments on this subject? > > On 4/07/05, Mary wrote: >> Pat: >> >> Well, there is me, you and Kevin. I think there are plenty of venues, the art I think is in the >> form of the message. Really, it is your call. >> >> Mary >> >> >> On 4/07/05, Pat wrote: >>> How many people really read the postings that have been placed at this particular section since >>> Feb 28? I doubt very many. >>> >>> On 4/07/05, mary wrote: >>>> Pat: >>>> >>>> How about this one? >>>> >>>> Mary >>>> >>>> On 4/07/05, Pat wrote: >>>>> What soap box do use? What venue? >>>>> >>>>> On 4/07/05, mary wrote: >>>>>> Pat: >>>>>> >>>>>> Short and sweet. Think key points. Links to the details. Try it out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mary >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/06/05, Pat wrote: >>>>>>> How do I get my message out? >>>>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Now you are talking!, 3/24/05, by mary.
- Re: Now you are talking!, 3/24/05, by v.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Research, 3/26/05, by Pat.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 3/26/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/02/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/02/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by hmmm.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/05/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by Pat.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/05/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/08/05, by KHYF.
- Re: Protected Class Members*Mary*, 4/08/05, by v.
- Re: Protected Class Members*Mary*, 4/08/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/09/05, by DD.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/24/05, by Patrick Casanova.
- Re: Patrick Casanova are you out there?, 5/04/05, by The other Pat.
- Re: Now you are talking!, 5/23/05, by saundra vickers.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/17/07, by dEAN.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/17/07, by johncodie.
|