The Post that is titled, Michael Fumento Hate Mail, could
easily make one assume that the post is a "hate mail
letter." In sequence, that mistaken assumption could easily
make a person avoid opening and then reading the post.
Well, for the record, that post was not a hate mail letter
to anybody.
It was a post that cited something which Mr. Fumento posted
in abridged form on his "Hate Mail" website; something to
which he attached a few defamatory comments.
The sections omitted by Michael Fumento were the pertinent
ones. And the omitting thereof illustrates another case of
"convenient omission of evidence." Thus, the previous post
is simply a "Case in Point" that covers the points. That's
all. It illustrates the replacing of truth with misleading
information, inserted in "closed parenthesis".
Once again, that previous post is NOT hate mail, and this
particular post is written "just in case" it was assumed to
have been so.
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.