Follow us!

    Re: Agraquest potential class action tort

    Posted by Phil on 11/08/05

    Could you please explain a little more to me. I may want to
    look into, and investigate this a little further.

    On 8/10/05, Dave wrote:
    > this might have been in the wrong forum from the beginning.
    > On 8/10/05, Dave wrote:
    >> In order to combat SBS, wouldn't you need to do research
    >> the organisms that cause it? But then deny it.
    >> AgraQuest is also targeting the control of mold and
    >> that cause sick building syndrome. This problem occurs
    >> certain types of microorganisms infect buildings and cause
    >> health problems including headaches, respiratory troubles,
    >> nosebleeds and memory loss.
    >> On 8/10/05, Dave wrote:
    >>> On 8/18/04, dave wrote:
    >>>> (David, CA.)
    >>>> Agraquest got me ill from exposure to pathogens and
    >>>> allergens and set me out the door, layed off. I have
    >>>> sick many years.
    >>>> I filed worker's comp. and now the company slanders me
    >>>> saying I was fired. However, I received severance pay
    >>>> one month and no dismissal letter. I never expected for
    >>>> other scientist to do this to me. I thought workplace
    >>>> safety was of the highest concern.
    >>>> I need to find an attorney and other former employees
    >>>> file a class action lawsuit to prevent this from
    >>>> to other laboratory workers.
    >>> still sick.
    >>> What ever happened to the Toxic Substance Control Act
    >>> Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories
    >>> (BMBL); The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
    >>> the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act?
    >>> This stuff Serenade, Bacillus subtilis, was weighed up
    in the
    >>> hallway and a bathroom. There are NIOSH exposure limits
    >>> this proteolytic enzyme is restricted to a Class 1
    > containment
    >>> at minimum.
    >>> The company's own documents state:
    >>> SerenadeTM WP was evaluated in a 4-hour, whole
    >>> body, acute inhalation study in male and female
    > Sprague-Dawley
    >>> rats.The maximum concentration (MC) which could be
    > aerosolized
    >>> was 0.63 milligrams per liter (mg/L), which gave a median
    >>> aerodynamic particle size of less than 0.4 . No
    mortality was
    >>> noted during the study. Some of the clinical
    >>> noted in one or more animals were transient incidences of
    >>> salvation, breathing abnormalities, decreased activity,
    > wobbly
    >>> gait, apparent hypothermia, hunched posture, decreased
    >>> defecation, urine stain, decreased food consumption, and
    >>> material around the facial area. Bwt loss was noted for
    >>> female rats (one during the 0-7 day interval, and two
    >>> the 7-14 day interval). However, this was a slight bwt
    >>> and was not considered to be biologically significant.
    >>> Here are two 1969 articles about detergent enzymes:
    >>> Flindt, M. H. L., "Pulmonary Disease Due to Inhalation of
    >>> Derivatives of Bacillus subtilis Containing Proteolytic
    >>> Enzyme." The Lancet, (1969), pp. 1177-1181.
    >>> Pepys, J. et al., "Allergic Reactions of the Lungs to
    >>> of Bacillus subtillis." The Lancet, (1969), pp. 1181-
    >>> When is somebody going to do something about this illegal
    >>> conduct?
    >>> It does not make common sense to have a mucus membrane
    >>> irritant and microbiology/pesticide/insecticide/fungicide
    >>> research in the same room without telling your employees
    > about
    >>> the hazard.
    >>> My medical bills add up to over $500,000. I get an IV
    > every 28
    >>> days. Surely, this is not normal.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.