Post: Re: Agraquest potential class action tort
Posted by Dave on 8/10/05
this might have been in the wrong forum from the beginning. On 8/10/05, Dave wrote: > In order to combat SBS, wouldn't you need to do research with > the organisms that cause it? But then deny it. > > > AgraQuest is also targeting the control of mold and bacteria > that cause sick building syndrome. This problem occurs when > certain types of microorganisms infect buildings and cause > health problems including headaches, respiratory troubles, > nosebleeds and memory loss. > http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2002/01/07/daily9.html > > > > > > On 8/10/05, Dave wrote: >> On 8/18/04, dave wrote: >>> (David, CA.) >>> Agraquest got me ill from exposure to pathogens and >>> allergens and set me out the door, layed off. I have been >>> sick many years. >>> >>> I filed worker's comp. and now the company slanders me by >>> saying I was fired. However, I received severance pay of >>> one month and no dismissal letter. I never expected for >>> other scientist to do this to me. I thought workplace >>> safety was of the highest concern. >>> >>> I need to find an attorney and other former employees to >>> file a class action lawsuit to prevent this from happening >>> to other laboratory workers. >> >> still sick. >> >> What ever happened to the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA); >> Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories >> (BMBL); The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) and >> the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act? >> >> This stuff Serenade, Bacillus subtilis, was weighed up in the >> hallway and a bathroom. There are NIOSH exposure limits and >> this proteolytic enzyme is restricted to a Class 1 containment >> at minimum. >> >> The company's own documents state: >> >> SerenadeTM WP was evaluated in a 4-hour, whole >> body, acute inhalation study in male and female Sprague-Dawley >> rats.The maximum concentration (MC) which could be aerosolized >> was 0.63 milligrams per liter (mg/L), which gave a median >> aerodynamic particle size of less than 0.4 . No mortality was >> noted during the study. Some of the clinical abnormalities >> noted in one or more animals were transient incidences of >> salvation, breathing abnormalities, decreased activity, wobbly >> gait, apparent hypothermia, hunched posture, decreased >> defecation, urine stain, decreased food consumption, and dark >> material around the facial area. Bwt loss was noted for three >> female rats (one during the 0-7 day interval, and two during >> the 7-14 day interval). However, this was a slight bwt loss >> and was not considered to be biologically significant. >> >> > http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/fung-nemat/aceticacid-etridiazole/bacillus_subtilis/bt_petition.html >> >> >> >> >> Here are two 1969 articles about detergent enzymes: >> >> Flindt, M. H. L., "Pulmonary Disease Due to Inhalation of >> Derivatives of Bacillus subtilis Containing Proteolytic >> Enzyme." The Lancet, (1969), pp. 1177-1181. >> >> Pepys, J. et al., "Allergic Reactions of the Lungs to Enzymes >> of Bacillus subtillis." The Lancet, (1969), pp. 1181-1184. >> >> >> When is somebody going to do something about this illegal >> conduct? >> >> It does not make common sense to have a mucus membrane >> irritant and microbiology/pesticide/insecticide/fungicide >> research in the same room without telling your employees about >> the hazard. >> >> My medical bills add up to over $500,000. I get an IV every 28 >> days. Surely, this is not normal.
subtilisin exposure limits
Posts on this thread, including this one
Re: Agraquest potential class action tort, 8/10/05, by Dave.
Re: Agraquest potential class action tort, 11/08/05, by Phil.
|