Re: Chinese Drywall Update 3-22-09
Posted by Dr. Daubert on 3/23/09
R Dude, Dr. Asphalt has had a rough time as of late. Seems that Daubert is kicking his ass on more than a few mold cases. I wonder what is left for him as a “professional” witness. One would believe that in order to survive as a “professional” witness, one would have to substantiate the “professional” part no matter what one thought of himself. Perception is not reality when it comes to Dr. Asphalt. Dr. Daubert On 3/22/09, Rem Dude wrote: > Was catching up on the latest and ran across this article > by Dr. Phillp Goad. > > "What has been found in drywall? > > Re Dr. Richard Lipsey's Feb. 8 article Know symptoms of > toxic-gas exposure: Under my direction, the Center for > Toxicology and Environmental Health has performed air > sampling and examined the results of similar sampling > performed by other organizations on behalf of Lennar. > There are some misleading statements in the article. > First, of the various sulfur compounds mentioned by > Lipsey, only carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide have > been consistently detected. No sulfur dioxide has ever > been detected and hydrogen sulfide only rarely so. We have > also found similar levels of these compounds in homes with > domestic drywall and in outside air samples. > > Second, contrary to his statements, the gases hydrogen > sulfide, carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide do > not ''become corrosive sulfuric acid'' when inhaled into > the lungs. These compounds are normally found in the human > body, but sulfuric acid is not a product formed in the > body from these compounds. > > Third, Lipsey discussed the formation of sulfuric acid > from sulfur dioxide. However, as mentioned above, we've > never detected sulfur dioxide in any of our testing. > > Finally, a discussion about the possible health effects of > chemicals is misleading if it does not point out that > these effects are dependent on the level of chemicals to > which someone is exposed. > > The two chemicals we and others have consistently found in > air testing, carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide, were > detected at concentrations below federal and state health > guidelines -- and hundreds to thousands of times lower > than levels shown to cause harm. > > The chemicals we identified in our testing are naturally > occurring, being produced from ocean water, salt marshes > and estuaries, soil, vegetation and forests. They also are > normally present in the human body and have been measured > in human breath at higher concentrations than we detected > in our home sampling. > > PHILLIP T. GOAD, managing partner and principal > toxicologist, Center for Toxicology and Environmental > Health, North Little Rock, Ark." > > Sounds like Dr. Goad slammed the door pretty hard on > Lipsey for spreading hype and misinformation > regarding "toxic" Chinese drywall. > > So far, no one has found dangerous levels of sulfur > compounds in any homes tested. > > RD
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Chinese Drywall Update 3-22-09, 3/22/09, by Rem Dude.
- Re: Chinese Drywall Update 3-22-09, 3/23/09, by Dr. Daubert.
- Re: Chinese Drywall Update 3-22-09, 3/24/09, by Rem Dude.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by Dr. Richard Lipsey, Jacksonville, FL.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by Concerned Citizen.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by Just Checking.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by remdude.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by Just Checking.
- Re: Chinese Drywall , 7/03/09, by ErikMoldWarrior.
|