Re: phen fen
Posted by PATTI JENSEN on 3/17/06
On 3/17/06, PATTI JENSEN wrote:
> On 3/10/06, Bob R/CA wrote:
>> On 3/10/06, claire wrote:
>>> I didn't know this thing was still going on. Settled back in
>>> 2001. Is this a chat for people who didn't opt out of the class
>>> action suit?
>>
>> I need to update the categories in this toxic torts forum. For
>> example, add a Vioxx chatboard would seem popular. Suggestions
>> for active areas of toxic tort litigation are most welcome....
JUST FYI THERE IS AN APPEAL BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT AS OF LAST
MONDAY. SO THE 7TH AMENDMENT IS STALLED UNTIL JR AND THE GANG DECIDED
IF THEY ARE GOUNG TO HEAR THE CASE OR NOT.
THE ORIGINAL SETTLEMENT IS ROLLING ABOUT AS SLOW AS A SNAIL IN A COMA,
AND ALL OF THE ATTORNEYS ARE GETTING RICH AS THEY FEED FROM THE FEN
PHEN TROUGH.
MOST OF THE CLAIMNTS NEVER GOT PAID AND IT LOOKS LIKE A REGULAR CLASS
ACTION WITH A TWIST. THE INTERNET HAS MOST OF THE VICTIMS BANNED
TOGETHER.
HAVE A GREAT DAY
Posts on this thread, including this one
- phen fen , 11/05/05, by kim.
- Re: phen fen , 11/05/05, by Laura.
- Re: phen fen , 11/15/05, by Sherry.
- Re: phen fen , 11/19/05, by kim.
- Re: phen fen , 11/19/05, by kim.
- Re: phen fen , 12/13/05, by Linda.
- Re: phen fen , 12/13/05, by Linda.
- Re: phen fen , 1/28/06, by brenda slayton.
- Re: phen fen , 3/10/06, by claire.
- Re: phen fen , 3/10/06, by Bob R/CA.
- Re: phen fen , 3/17/06, by PATTI JENSEN.
- Re: phen fen , 3/17/06, by PATTI JENSEN.
- Re: phen fen , 12/30/06, by Terri L. Pritchard.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.