Re: Ronald Gots
Posted by Pat on 5/22/03
Hey sorry for the delay in answering your other question. I am re-writing my essay before submitting it. On 5/22/03, SaraH wrote: > Pat > Gotts may be slowing down but his cohorts are alive and active. > Time for them to be unmasked as well. > SaraH > > On 5/21/03, Pat wrote: >> I'm not totally sure, but I think Gots is starting to back off. >> I may be incorrect though. >> >> On 5/14/03, SaraH wrote: >>> Pat, >>> Any idea if Gots still tries to tesitfy in cases or has he >>> left that to his less infamous coherts at the International >>> center in Rockville Md? If one looks up his coherts they have >>> as colorful a history as Gots but less notorious. Any idea >>> as to what month your article will appear? >>> Thanks >>> SaraH >>> >>> On 5/13/03, Pat wrote: >>>> Probably everyone here knows who Ronald Gots is. Anyone >>>> familiar with his writings or speeches knows he is an >>>> excellent wordsmith (not as good as me though ;)) >>>> >>>> I thought it might interest some of the alleged skeptics >>>> here to know that I contacted Gots a long time ago and asked >>>> him, very kindly, to refute the data I presented. Gots never >>>> replied. Same with Stephen Barrett (Barrett's own daughter >>>> has FM, which overlaps with MCS over 50&37; of the time), >>>> though he did reply once but didn't offer any rebuttals >>>> instead referred me to an essay from 10 years ago (which has >>>> already been trashed by Ashford and Miller). In my opinion, >>>> this says a lot about their willingness to openly view >>> data. >>>> >>>> In not too long from now an essay of mine will appear in an >>>> issue of the IJT. I think it will pretty much blow the >>>> shreds out of the basis for MCS skepticism. >>>> >>>> Anywho, cheers to all, >>>> >>>> Pat >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
|