Re: Dr. Shoemaker's Treatment Protocol-Yes, he's a Quack!

More | Report Post

A good ole FDA medical disclaimer does not however; excuse the
Shoemaker, Huddell, groups web master also a Huddell from giving,
or administering a medical test that contradicted a doctor in
california's diagnosis and treatment. Even if this guy was in
Singapore, he could have been under treatment by telepone. I don't
think these guys buypassing other medical doctors or treatments is
a good idea, and violates the guidelines of the American Medial
Association. Obviously should violate the medical board of the
state of virgina for a non-doctor presribing a test, and giving
advise to a man half way around the world in a hospital with a
diagnoisis, his test did not confirm. You guys really need to go
back and think about this one. Its bad enough that you can get
medications by mail-in, but when a guy in the hospital is getting a
download of CVS battery of test that does not meet that hospitals
protocol; you have a bad case of malpractice, and fraud.

You can get this contrast test administered anywhere; and anyone
can try to assign statistics to what a person knows he has. That
however does not admit or deny what they don't know he has. The
only good application i have seen is for glycoma or high blood
pressure, is the patient taking their medications. The medicine
that they are administering might be great for the vast population,
but God forbid if they kill a person, because of what they did not
see he had.

MCS/MCSS Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST