Follow us!

    Re: D. Elliot, Dr. Johan Elliot, are these aliases?

    Posted by ff on 7/02/03

    D.J. Elliot:

    Well, I am certainly not the board boss here, but typically, you would
    refrain from strong wording such as "quack" until you have quacked your
    own way throught the "unfolding events" as you mention. You also
    stated "We are currently in a settlement with him." How much more
    unfolding do you need, after your quack crack?


    On 7/02/03, Dr. J. Elliot wrote:
    > On 6/24/03, ff wrote:
    > All in good time. Someone simply asked for public opinion on the
    > subject of this chap so I provided my own experience. The facts will
    > unfold as in any case.
    > Until then, the truth will prevail.
    >> To: the above named subject/s:
    >> Would you please be so kind as to provide specific information
    >> necessary to confirm/defirm the statements/accusations you have made?
    >> Would you explain what you mean by your statement "We are currently
    >> in a settlement with him"?
    >> Is there some other name that you would be identified by, either with
    >> Dr. Shoemaker, or in the litigation/settlement you referenced?
    >> I look forward to your response.
    >> FF
    >> On 6/24/03, ff wrote:
    >>> Mr. Elliot:
    >>> Is it Dr. Elliot? Would you please name those qualified
    >>> persons/professionals that led you to the conclusion you have
    >>> broadcast on Toxlaw. Secondly, if in fact you have a lawsuit, does
    >>> your attorney recommend that you express your opinions (or are they
    >>> his opinions?) on an international website, specifically naming
    >>> (and name calling) the person you identify as the defendant?
    >>> You sound like an attorney's nightmare to me, and a nightmare for
    >>> others you cross paths with. One thing that I believe has recently
    >>> been cleared up on this board, and there seems to be a consensus
    >>> here I hope, is that the style of the post is an indication of
    >>> credibility and intent. I can picture your pre-trial post coming
    >>> into the courtroom, in your case, as it goes to your character.
    >>> Possibly you should have waited until a decision has been reached?
    >>> "If you don't like it..., It makes no matter...,Too bad... " falls
    >>> short of what is needed.
    >>> FF
    >>> On 6/24/03, D. Elliot wrote:
    >>>> I just speak the truth. If you don't like it, look up my case in
    >>>> international courts. I live overseas. It makes no matter.
    >>>> You trust this quack. Too bad. Ask Melinda Ballard. She will
    >>>> tell you. The truth will prevail in the end.
    >>>> Dr. Johan Elliot
    >>>> On 6/24/03, johncodie wrote:
    >>>>> If you are going to slam a guy, could you be good enough to
    >>>>> identify the state, or federal court, perhaps judge that is
    >>>>> going to hear that settlement has been cleared from his court.
    >>>>> We want the truth. But we don't want people denied the same
    >>>>> rights. Just provide a start to the road map for success.
    >>>>> Don't leave everyone else hanging.
    >>>>> On 6/24/03, D. Elliot wrote:
    >>>>>> On 6/17/03, C J wrote:
    >>>>>>> Are there any MCSers who have tried Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker's
    >>>>>>> Treatment? I am concidering it and would love to hear from
    >>>>>>> anyone who has tried it or something similar already.THANKS!
    >>>>>>> CJ
    >>>>>> Ritchie doesn't know what he's doing. He prescribes this
    >>>>>> drug for a short period of time and doesn't know all of the
    >>>>>> ramnifications! Cholestyramine needs to be prescribed for at
    >>>>>> least 8 months to work in addition to other protocols. We
    >>>>>> are currently in a settlement with him. Don't trust him!

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.