Re: D. Elliot, Dr. Johan Elliot, are these aliases?

More | Report Post

Be patient young man and then you will become wise.

On 7/02/03, ff wrote:
>
>
> D.J. Elliot:
>
> Well, I am certainly not the board boss here, but typically, you would
> refrain from strong wording such as "quack" until you have quacked your
> own way throught the "unfolding events" as you mention. You also
> stated "We are currently in a settlement with him." How much more
> unfolding do you need, after your quack crack?
>
> ff
>
>
> On 7/02/03, Dr. J. Elliot wrote:
>> On 6/24/03, ff wrote:
>>>
>>
>> All in good time. Someone simply asked for public opinion on the
>> subject of this chap so I provided my own experience. The facts will
>> unfold as in any case.
>>
>> Until then, the truth will prevail.
>>>
>>> To: the above named subject/s:
>>>
>>> Would you please be so kind as to provide specific information
>>> necessary to confirm/defirm the statements/accusations you have made?
>>>
>>> Would you explain what you mean by your statement "We are currently
>>> in a settlement with him"?
>>>
>>> Is there some other name that you would be identified by, either with
>>> Dr. Shoemaker, or in the litigation/settlement you referenced?
>>>
>>> I look forward to your response.
>>>
>>> FF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/24/03, ff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Elliot:
>>>>
>>>> Is it Dr. Elliot? Would you please name those qualified
>>>> persons/professionals that led you to the conclusion you have
>>>> broadcast on Toxlaw. Secondly, if in fact you have a lawsuit, does
>>>> your attorney recommend that you express your opinions (or are they
>>>> his opinions?) on an international website, specifically naming
>>>> (and name calling) the person you identify as the defendant?
>>>>
>>>> You sound like an attorney's nightmare to me, and a nightmare for
>>>> others you cross paths with. One thing that I believe has recently
>>>> been cleared up on this board, and there seems to be a consensus
>>>> here I hope, is that the style of the post is an indication of
>>>> credibility and intent. I can picture your pre-trial post coming
>>>> into the courtroom, in your case, as it goes to your character.
>>>> Possibly you should have waited until a decision has been reached?
>>>>
>>>> "If you don't like it..., It makes no matter...,Too bad... " falls
>>>> short of what is needed.
>>>>
>>>> FF
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/24/03, D. Elliot wrote:
>>>>> I just speak the truth. If you don't like it, look up my case in
>>>>> international courts. I live overseas. It makes no matter.
>>>>> You trust this quack. Too bad. Ask Melinda Ballard. She will
>>>>> tell you. The truth will prevail in the end.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Johan Elliot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/24/03, johncodie wrote:
>>>>>> If you are going to slam a guy, could you be good enough to
>>>>>> identify the state, or federal court, perhaps judge that is
>>>>>> going to hear that settlement has been cleared from his court.
>>>>>> We want the truth. But we don't want people denied the same
>>>>>> rights. Just provide a start to the road map for success.
>>>>>> Don't leave everyone else hanging.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/24/03, D. Elliot wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/17/03, C J wrote:
>>>>>>>> Are there any MCSers who have tried Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker's
>>>>>>>> Treatment? I am concidering it and would love to hear from
>>>>>>>> anyone who has tried it or something similar already.THANKS!
>>>>>>>> CJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ritchie doesn't know what he's doing. He prescribes this
>>>>>>> drug for a short period of time and doesn't know all of the
>>>>>>> ramnifications! Cholestyramine needs to be prescribed for at
>>>>>>> least 8 months to work in addition to other protocols. We
>>>>>>> are currently in a settlement with him. Don't trust him!

MCS/MCSS Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST