Follow us!

    Re: Re:fungicides/EPA ,etc,etc, Hey Mary

    Posted by ff on 7/18/03


    You are still pretty far off from anything I have tried to convey. I appreciate Mr. Moultous' effort, and
    regret his family's health problems, but somehow, if you want to make a change, letters like Mr. Moultous
    need to be recognized as potentially damaging to his effort rather than beneficial (I have written a few
    myself). I propose that a beneficial effort should be focused on those entities responsible for suppression
    bias. Then, legitimate entities are presented accurate information rather than unknowingly, having already
    formed invalid opinions, formed as a result of suppression bias. We will not live long enough to make
    accomplishments by APPEARING as a whinining, nagging, entity to others that don't want to hear it in the
    first place.


    On 7/18/03, johncodie wrote:
    > My first introduction to Ken Moultous on the sickbuilding board yahoo was veiwing a hospital bed that was
    > in his home for his son. Ken had to move back to Oklahoma to have a place to live after suffering all the
    > years of inactivity. At first the assumptions are wow what a whiner, or this guy must be a mental case.
    > But after a few years and realization that nursing homes are abusing our loved ones by neglect and finally
    > pass laws to protect. The unfortunate families that provide hospital home care for a loved one has little
    > to no laws to protect the quality of air, or housing for their most desperate citizens. While bed ridden
    > they are protected by the same Constitutional Rights of every other able bodied man and woman.
    > Bias starts with the individual and extends across state lines. As a ragging range fire threating
    > thousands of families across our nation, legislation is being passed to study the effects of fire on
    > dewelling. To much time is being lost in the time period. We need updated building codes,and laws for
    > TEXAS flood victims now; Minimum moisture readings within a building over a time period before it has to
    > be ripped open and remediated. The days of it will dry, and paint stain block over it and path it are over.
    > Mr. Moultous
    > From:
    > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:03:15 EDT
    > Subject: For the hearing on SB657
    > To:,
    > CC:,,
    > HTML Attachment [ Scan with Norton AntiVirus | Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase | Download Without Scan ]
    > For the hearing on SB657 (please forward to the committee) -
    > July 17, 2003
    > I was unable to attend the hearing on SB657, Toxic Mold bill by Rob O'Leary, on July 16, 2003 at the State
    > House. My family and I are sick and recovering from the severe and unhealthy effects from the Toxic Mold
    > that was in our home in Centerville.
    > My Wife, Virginia, recently had to have eye surgery. It seems her eyes are infected from the Toxic Mold and
    > it caused a tumor to grow. While you listen to feel good legislation, Virginia almost lost her sight.
    > Remember our Toxic Mold is the direct result of the documented, in Government Public Records you have all
    > seen, illegal acts and failures of Massachusetts and the Town of Barnstable.
    > A little over a year ago we spoke before your Committee about the Toxic Mold bill we had written and
    > proposed. I listened to your speeches in front of the television cameras after the hearing in which you
    > described what needed to be changed to make my legislation acceptable.
    > I made the changes you stated in your television interview and resubmitted it to you as a replacement. It
    > was then that you showed, by your total failure to act, that your television statements were a ruse.
    > The bill by State Senator Rob O'Leary is a do nothing piece of legislation that will harm rather than help
    > in the fight against Toxic Mold. It will allow, you, the State to stall. Anybody that has been infected by
    > Toxic Mold does not need another biased study to be done. We need action. NOW!
    > We need responsible politicians to help us. Sadly, after an exhausting search over the past decade, I have
    > found self-serving politicians who grandstand on issues and ignore people. You speak of your sadness and
    > concerns before the media and then do NOTHING!
    > My family, like many others, lived in Toxic Mold for some years before we knew we had it. If it had been in
    > our workplace perhaps we could have found another job but we were not so lucky. It was where we lived, ate
    > and slept. It infected all of us. According to Medical, Insurance and Toxic Mold reports, our Toxic Mold is
    > a direct result of the combined corruption and failures of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Town
    > of Barnstable,
    > Even before I knew of the Toxic Mold I came to Beacon Hill and the state for help to fight the government
    > corruption of the local and state building inspectors that knowingly allowed this to happen to us. I
    > contacted every Governor and AG since 1993. All protected the corrupt and the corruption rather than the
    > citizens. All of the investigating Massachusetts agencies; Inspector General, Banking, Auditor, Treasurer
    > and others, turned a deaf ear to corruption.
    > You, the Legislature went so far as to pass a bill, without discussion or record of votes, to grant
    > immunity to any corrupt inspectors that broke the law. This was done to stop my efforts to have
    > accountability. By doing this, you, the legislature emboldened more open and widespread corruption. You
    > allowed the expansion and growth of Toxic Mold. You must bear the responsibility for many of the illnesses
    > we face from the Toxic Mold.
    > The State Health Department and DEP have refused my requests for them to inspect our Toxic Mold. These are
    > two groups that you now want to lead the study of Toxic Mold. In my opinion, they wouldn't know it was
    > daylight unless they held a study or read it somewhere.
    > The state building standards, another group you want to lead the study, is headed by Tom Rogers. As I told
    > you all over a year ago, he was ruled by the State as not qualified to be a building inspector but he still
    > holds his job. I also told you he even refused to provide reports requested in a hand delivered memo from
    > the AG for reports of inspector and builder corruption he had inspected. The investigation was closed. A
    > few years ago he even failed to respond to requests from the Legislature.
    > I also told you and showed you State Public Records that he said our home was unsafe and illegal due to the
    > illegal acts of the town and state but he refused to write a report as the law and his job required. Have
    > you ever bothered to question him on these violations of State Law? Why has he not been fired?
    > This is wonderful Massachusetts and what you say passes for Government sounds more like a third world
    > country where corruption is the rule rather than the exception. If you want to support O'Leary's bill, feel
    > free to. It is a waste of time that helps nobody. It allows those that have been asked to investigate in
    > the past to play a farce in your "new" effort of politics.
    > I call them like I see them and I call this a sucker piece of feel good legislation, that helps nobody ill
    > from Toxic Mold. The SD2070 that I submitted is the legislation I refined to satisfy your objections that
    > you expressed last year. It does what you wanted so why are you holding it prisoner? The answer is your
    > television comments were public relations rather than the truth.
    > Ken Moulton
    > P O Box 874
    > Hyannisport, MA 02647
    > E-mail:
    > On 7/15/03, johncodie wrote:
    >> On 7/15/03, ff wrote:
    >>> Johncodie:
    >>> You are so far off from anything I have tried to convey to you. If you want to extract the truth,
    >>> change your methods? Personally, and respectfully mr. johncodie, I am not going to waste any more time
    >>> or space while you weave in and out of various issues and events, short of the information you need to
    >>> reach valid conclusions.
    >> Personally, I have been awakened to the unsuspecting, apathetic
    >> public, really getting what they deserve (or to put it a better way, what they do not earn by failing
    >> to keep up with their civic duty, unless hit personally, they don't get involved).
    >> Im sorry I don't feel the same way. If you live in Boston and you don't fit in with the Kennedy bias
    >> then your not going to win. Talk with Ken Moltous, he left Barnstable MA to go back to Oklahoma to
    >> survive. He is writting legislation that is getting buried in Study. He did not did deserve the
    >> nonsupport to the State Officials there. I just don't think the lack of education, or fear should keep
    >> thehard earning taxpayers, from getting their dollars worth. It, "insurance/mortgage finance" and
    >> disclosure has been termed "legal stealing". Now that is an oxy-moron.
    >> If we don't have any protected rights, then why did everyone waste thier time celebrating the 4th this
    >> year? Since morals don't involve religon, it might not go around to everyone; the worst sin is being
    >> betrayed.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.