Re: Dr. Shoemaker's Treatment Protocol

More | Report Post

Dr. Rosen:

If warranted, could you comment further on the conference, differing
opinions, and new information presented. Reflecting on the board
posts which hold to strong opinions, I am wondering if the leading
scientists/researchers remain objective in the interest of good
science even though they may feel stringly about their theories or
conclusions.

ff

On 9/21/03, Gary Rosen, Ph.D. wrote:
> I was recently at the 5th Annual Bioaerosols Conference in Saratoga
> Springs, NY (www.fungalresearchgroup.com) where Dr. Shoemaker and
> his resarch partner Dr. Hudnell from the EPA where presenting their
> work. This international conference takes place every two years
> and attracts leading researchers interested in medical and
> analytical research on fungi (mold.) I believe that the work was
> considered very thought provoking for many of the attendees. Dr.
> Shoemaker's work is a follow on from the discovery by Dr. Hudnell
> of the EPA that the results of neurotoxicity from certain bacteria
> fouling the lakes and stream in the Maryland area was 90&37;
> reversable by a very simple procedure that has now been approved by
> the FDA. Dr Hudnell and Shoemaker had subsequently observed that
> children and adults suffering from exposure to high levels of
> indoor mold exhibited similar symptons to the neurotoxicity from
> the water borne bacteria. What followed was their work showing
> neurotoxicity from indoor mold could be reversed by the same
> procedures that reversed the illnesses from exposure to neurotoxin
> producing bacteria in lakes and streams (the ones that were killing
> all those fish we all read about a few years back.)
>
> Gary Rosen, Ph.D.

MCS/MCSS Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST