Re: Dr. Shoemaker's Treatment Protocol
Posted by John Codie on 9/21/03
Found different information as how information can be misreported,
or in error. I am sure I have. The report I have on Dr. Shoemaker
was he was provided 300,000 from the manufacture of the binding
agent to look for as many applications for their product before it
was recalled. PHD's from NOA in South Carolina are reporting the
product alos binds with marine toxic alge to reduce its toxic
effect. I believe if we dig a little bit deeper, the product was
allowed by the FDA to apply the product by various individuals to
see what the risk benefits are before it was recalled. A product
recalled by the FDA is just that stop selling for consumer use.
No slander as CVS is a vision test also administered for so many
applications; so please don't give me a standard lecture. The real
judge of a product often comes from the Federal Trade Commission as
a product that makes claims that the manufacture can not legally
represent as being the truth. I have aleady see a ozone machine,
and a spay on product that claims to kill mold fined, and put on
hold. We are all for your groups having your conferences and there
are all kind of labs, and groups that would like to get on the band
wagon. We might be farmers, country boys, or the next break trough
scientist. If we need to get a talk started about bias, or pure
science we could with the first OBGYN doctors were created by the
needs of a black Alabama Slave holder, extending his care provided
in a caring and human attempt to right a few wrongs.
So you can park all the fancy words at the fence row gate, you
better start talking the truth, and know the truth when you enter
Gods country.
Posts on this thread, including this one