Re: Dr. Shoemaker's Treatment Protocol
Posted by ff on 9/21/03
johncodie:
a few notes on your post:
Choestyramine: if it has been recalled, I am unaware of it as it is
still in inventory and being sold (by prescription). There are likely
several types of recalls, and also voluntary withdrawals, which have
nothing to do with efficacy, false claims, or reports of adverse
effects.
Ozone machines - not analogous to cholestyramine (CSM). CSM has been
on the market for, let me guess, thirty years (as an FDA approved
product)? I agree with you about false claims made on performance of
a lot of products or "equipment" that continually hit the market for
short periods of time and usually by-pass regulatory and medical
approval.
ff
On 9/21/03, John Codie wrote:
> Found different information as how information can be misreported,
> or in error. I am sure I have. The report I have on Dr. Shoemaker
> was he was provided 300,000 from the manufacture of the binding
> agent to look for as many applications for their product before it
> was recalled. PHD's from NOA in South Carolina are reporting the
> product alos binds with marine toxic alge to reduce its toxic
> effect. I believe if we dig a little bit deeper, the product was
> allowed by the FDA to apply the product by various individuals to
> see what the risk benefits are before it was recalled. A product
> recalled by the FDA is just that stop selling for consumer use.
>
> No slander as CVS is a vision test also administered for so many
> applications; so please don't give me a standard lecture. The real
> judge of a product often comes from the Federal Trade Commission as
> a product that makes claims that the manufacture can not legally
> represent as being the truth. I have aleady see a ozone machine,
> and a spay on product that claims to kill mold fined, and put on
> hold. We are all for your groups having your conferences and there
> are all kind of labs, and groups that would like to get on the band
> wagon. We might be farmers, country boys, or the next break trough
> scientist. If we need to get a talk started about bias, or pure
> science we could with the first OBGYN doctors were created by the
> needs of a black Alabama Slave holder, extending his care provided
> in a caring and human attempt to right a few wrongs.
>
> So you can park all the fancy words at the fence row gate, you
> better start talking the truth, and know the truth when you enter
> Gods country.
Posts on this thread, including this one