Follow us!

    Re: suppression/repression bias - make a difference

    Posted by ff on 6/27/03


    Would you please provide the name of the attorney you reference, if this is

    My first post on this board referenced false assumptions you made based on
    fragmented information. I believe Dr. Hudnell also pointed this out. This
    is understandable and not a criticism. In reviewing your posts, you have
    combined several separate events into one. The one that I am familiar with
    needs to be extracted from your combination. Once you understand that, if
    you have any questions, may we can clear it up, provided you don't ramble on
    into more false assumptions.

    A couple of things in particular, regarding one event:

    1.) You keep implying Dr. Shoemaker was working for me and/or DuPont. You
    apparently reached this conclusion after reading a quote in a Delaware
    newpaper. Not the case Mr. Codie, Dr. Shoemaker was hired by FDEP. I knew
    Dr. Shoemaker prior to this, and my relationship was completely independent
    of the FDEP event in which a neighborhood coincidentally read about Dr.
    Shoemaker's work, symptoms associated with environmental exposures, and
    contacted him directly. Eventually FDEP was called in to investigate, and
    also contacted Dr. Shoemaker.

    2.) VCS Testing in that event was conducted locally by local physicians that
    the neighborhood residents visited. I was not a part of this, so that's all
    I know, and it is their business, not mine or yours.

    If you have any (appropriate) questions for events of which I have knowledge,
    feel free to contact me via email. If you have questions regarding other
    events, please go to the appropriate source. Above all, we can save a lot of
    time and space, and return to meaningful discussion, if you will simply get
    the facts straight rather than to speculate and confuse.

    I hope this clears up the confusion.


    On 6/27/03, johncodie wrote:
    > State of Florida should take note of recent court rulings. Local plantiff
    > attorney has come forward with his political contributions because it is
    > good for the public to know. If local politicians would take note, it
    > might put an end to the suppression/repression bias. Are there any
    > individuals that won't agree that Wingate was telling the truth. Why
    > should a man telling the truth have to lose his family and become a high
    > school chemistry professor? I think it has something to do with the fear
    > of losing control as a middle man, and thus be outside the money flow. I
    > will leave the term "attending physicain" alone until a better place and
    > time.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.