Re: Codie's no Mary
Posted by Mary on 6/27/03
Hey FF:
Been here all along. Just kinda hanging back and watching. Pretty weird place for the most
part.
What can I say... Johncodie is just being Johncodie. I'm sure he is a lot of fun at a dep.
For all involved.
Best Regards,
Mary
On 6/27/03, ff wrote:
>
>
> Hey Mary?
>
> Mary, are you out there? Could Mr. Codie contact you for lessons, he has a problem with
> coherency, foundation, speculation, relevance, and rather than leading questions, he has
> leaping answers. Is there a reading test or evaluation that couold be you used to help
> him understand, that he cannot reach valid conclusions from fragmented information
topped
> off by his imagination and paranoia?
>
> Possibly Mr. Codie could cross notice and sit in on your next deposition, can he ask
> leaping questions?
>
> ff
>
>
>
>
> On 6/27/03, ff wrote:
>>
>>
>> Mr. johncodie
>>
>> Again...still...you leap into fasle conclusions. Yes you do make it up. Possibly you
>> do
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/27/03, John Codie wrote:
>>> Then the proper response would be that you don't have any specific knowledge
>>> concerning VCS, Doctor Shoemaker, or Dupont.
>>
>> If you will carefully look at your statement, possibly you will understand what I have
>> been trying to tell you: YOU JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS, where do you get this from???? As
>> far as a proper response, you have no standing or authority, you do not require a
>> proper response, and obviously you would not know one way or the other.
>>
>> I don't make up the information, it is
>>> readily available in the public domain.
>>
>>
>> Yes you do make it up, that is exactly what you do when you conjour up these
>> regurgitations that leave you laying in a pool of confusion. (OK FF, that was off color)
>>
>> I will let the plantiff lawyers in the state
>>> of Florida pick up on the attorney, expert witness bias.
>>
>> You don't "let the plaintiff's lawyers..." do anything. You have no standing here, no
>> authority, and as I discussed in a previous post, please recognize that in the overall
>> scheme of things, you and I both are really, insignificant.
>>
>>
>> The residents of Florida
>>> will be the ones who have to live, or try to live with the quality of water there.
>>
>> You need only visit your own state, just a few miles down the road, to where, Miss. DEQ
>> permitted the pumping of waste water contaning dioxins, into the ground water supply.
>> You have plenty to do in your own back yard, so I am at least glad that you recognize
>> Florida will have to handle their own problems, but thank you for you concern just the
>> same.
>>
>>
>> ff
Posts on this thread, including this one