Re: Codie's inherently flawed
Posted by ff on 6/27/03
What? Too many flaws inherent in his post/thinking for me, or is it just me? How truthful is
the response if the attorney cannot make you answer because you responded "I don't have any
On 6/27/03, johncodie wrote:
> Thanks for the Compliment.
> You don't have any problem with the person being disposed from being honest do you Mary?
> You know its the place where the attornys go before the trail so they can size up their
> case. The place where questions get a truthful response. The attorny can't make you have a
> answer, as you can simply say that you don't have any knowledge. Like I pointed out earlier
> the tobacco attorny requested his name be revealed to the public as securing a loan for the
> Lt. Governor. His star witness Wingate went against the State of Kentucky and gave a
> depostiton as medical, for public health that would have made it admissable, and could not be
> suppressed. Greg and Frank, Jump out in the defense of Dr. Shoemaker who has been made a
> public figure, as advertised on boards to be the leading Medical Lead. One post designated
> him as a Quack and alleged a pending settlment which was responded with a name drop to M.
> Ballard, and international court. It depends which side your on if the depostion is going to
> be fun Mary. If your telling the truth and don't have anything to hide, its great. If you
> have been lying and trying to concel information, it can be Hell. So you decide who has
> anything to hide.
> On 6/27/03, Mary wrote:
>> Hey FF:
>> Been here all along. Just kinda hanging back and watching. Pretty weird place for the most
>> What can I say... Johncodie is just being Johncodie. I'm sure he is a lot of fun at a dep.
>> For all involved.
>> Best Regards,
Posts on this thread, including this one