Re: Codie's inherently flawed

More | Report Post

Mary has to ask Phares if a client should post, if he/she is in litigation. If you have never
been in litigation, or or deposition, you should know that you can't bagger your witness being
disposed of having any specific knowledge. It just gets you own to the next question. If you do
have specific knowledge that later comes back, and you responded negative, it indicates you were
being untruthful. I told you before Frank, if you don't have any specific knowledge, just say
you don't. Nobel to try to defend Dr. Shoemaker, but I don't think he would return the favor.
On 6/27/03, ff wrote:
>
>
> Mary"
>
> What? Too many flaws inherent in his post/thinking for me, or is it just me? How truthful is
> the response if the attorney cannot make you answer because you responded "I don't have any
> knowledge."
>
> ff
>
>

MCS/MCSS Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST