Follow us!

    Re: Codie's inherently flawed

    Posted by johncodie on 6/27/03

    Mary has to ask Phares if a client should post, if he/she is in litigation. If you have never
    been in litigation, or or deposition, you should know that you can't bagger your witness being
    disposed of having any specific knowledge. It just gets you own to the next question. If you do
    have specific knowledge that later comes back, and you responded negative, it indicates you were
    being untruthful. I told you before Frank, if you don't have any specific knowledge, just say
    you don't. Nobel to try to defend Dr. Shoemaker, but I don't think he would return the favor.
    On 6/27/03, ff wrote:
    > Mary"
    > What? Too many flaws inherent in his post/thinking for me, or is it just me? How truthful is
    > the response if the attorney cannot make you answer because you responded "I don't have any
    > knowledge."
    > ff

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.