Re: thanks for clearing it up
Posted by Mary on 6/27/03
Thanks for clearing up how depositions work. It was all kinda fuzzy until you explained it so
well. You've been a great help.
On 6/27/03, johncodie wrote:
> Mary has to ask Phares if a client should post, if he/she is in litigation. If you have never
> been in litigation, or or deposition, you should know that you can't bagger your witness being
> disposed of having any specific knowledge. It just gets you own to the next question. If you
> have specific knowledge that later comes back, and you responded negative, it indicates you were
> being untruthful. I told you before Frank, if you don't have any specific knowledge, just say
> you don't. Nobel to try to defend Dr. Shoemaker, but I don't think he would return the favor.
> On 6/27/03, ff wrote:
>> What? Too many flaws inherent in his post/thinking for me, or is it just me? How truthful is
>> the response if the attorney cannot make you answer because you responded "I don't have any
Posts on this thread, including this one