Re: for John Codie
Posted by rebecca on 9/20/04
On 7/09/03, johncodie wrote: > On 7/09/03, Sally wrote: >> John, >> I somehow wish I could meet you. Being an educated village > idiot, there is safety in the village, or jungle. Having > clearances and other information that can't be divulged > relevant to MCS that might not be possible at this time. > > I do not want to convince >> you (or anyone else) to use cholestyramine as a treatment >> for whatever ails you. > > My thoughts for help would go the Gingersnap19642002 from the > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sickbuildings group. She has > been forced by Portsmith Naval Shipyard to go on > disabilites. Her case is the most public and political for > MCS that provides one of the best test cases for Dr. > Shoemaker, or Dr. Huddell. It has already reached > congessional attention, and has been addressed by upper DOD > management. There is a challenge there to put patient to > cure, so she may return to work. > > > However, I would like you to know >> that I have approximately 30 lbs. of doctors' records kept >> in my closet to prove how awful my "disease" was. I saw >> just about every specialist you can name in the medical >> field. They all had "positive" results in one aspect or >> another that I was truly suffering from something that they >> could not explain. Unfortunately, most doctors are only >> knowledgable in the treatment of symptoms. This is >> especially true when no "disease" is catalogued to have a >> definition that includes every problem I used to have. So I >> ended up with a closet full of medications. They all were >> successful, to some extent, to releave symptoms I was >> experiencing. > > However, Dr. Richie Shoemaker's protocol had >> an effect on all of the symptoms. Dr. Hudnell gave it a >> name. > > Dr. Richie Shoemaker became a celeberty with his knowledge > and treatment of redtide, which is occuring world wide. > > It is a fact that he did not first administer > cholestryrmiane. It has been on the market for many years as > a cholestrial reducer. I have basic knowlege of cleating > agents from my background. What toxins are removed by > cholestryrmiane is not clearly know but it is a product that > has been studied for many years for the benefit of diebetic > patients where blood sugar, and reduction of cholestial is > very important. > > VCS was not originated by Dr. Shoemaker or Dr. Hudnell as it > has been used else where as indications if patients have been > taking their medications; and for specifics for early > detection of other body and eye diseases. The claims of > association of toxins with cures has not been shown to be > contained within controlled clinical evaluations. > > I realize how many people think them to be "quacks", >> or whatever. But it takes years to prove some theories. I >> have nothing but the utmost respect for those two. > > The two have reach celeberty status from their persentations > to international peer review groups and persentations to > senior citizens of thier treatment protocols. > > I would not be able to continue their fight to try showing >> neighsayers they are correct. I came from a very extensive >> scientific background. My father was a physicist with over >> 150 patents. My mother was a mensa. Both of them instilled >> in me the sense of wonder, and doubt. All I can say is, if >> they were alive now, they would have no doubts about Dr. >> Shoemaker and Dr. Hudnell's work. > > I may be the village idot but I have the basic higher > education with a minor in math; organic and inorganic > chemistry; put 25 years in the industry to know the business > of salesmanship. > > > Plus, my father's >> favorite line about research was "it is easier to prove >> something is NOT true, than it is to prove something IS >> true". > > This is not research, it is the salesmanship of a protocol > for cholestryamine using VCS that has been applied to almost > every ailment that current medical dictionaies have not > designated an appropriate diagnosis. > > There are still a few old timers that still believe that when > a cancer patient is realing from the side effects of > radiation or chemotherpy that a old fashioned Enema is a good > cure. Point being if cholestryamine has a benefical effect > for most all people regardless because we are an obess > society; why should we not just prescribe it as we supplement > with multiple vitamins. Reason Kraft is preparing for the > next generation "FAT" litigation. > > Don't get me wrong, my family has been helped with menopause > because most doctors can't handel the changing of life, or > properly treat for it. The Dr. (Female) simply stated less > is more; but it is regimented in first exercise and good > health. > >> >> I respectfully am closing now, Sally > > My problem is a political is one as we have been taken to the > cleaners, robbed and taken to the county line and abandoned. > My message to Frank as he vaguely admitted that you two did > work together, was "so what". My family can't afford this > continuing stream of "so what" for seven years. A higher > authority will have to define the price of what > these "multitude of so whats" is going to cost them. > > If something could be done for Gingersnap19642000's MCS; > there would be alot more happy people. We shared a rather > lonely New Years Eve on the > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sickbuildings board.
|