Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE
Posted by Surfer Chick, Also....... on 10/11/08
In my post I forgot to add that after leaving several phone messages for Dr. Klimas and getting no reply, I sent an e- mail to Dr. Lina Garcia to forward to Dr. Klimas. In my e-mail, I stated how I thought highly of Dr. Klimas and informed her how dissatisfied I was and that I felt had been dumped. I didn't get a reply from the e-mail. Three times after the e-mail, I called and left a message with her office as did my father, we never got a reply. Had Dr. Klimas called back, followed up with me by giving me an appointment or the phone consult that she had stated would take place after my tests came back, I would not be typing this message for the public to see. I don't take joy in writing this message because I really liked Dr. Klimas when I met her. I thought this is a caring person. Future patients have the right to make informed choices, that is my justification for this outting of my unfortunate experience. I had shared my experience with two of my doctors and they agreed that Dr. Klimas had "dumped" me and that the reason was most likely because I have Lyme Disease, but whatever the reason it was unethical and unprofessional. On 10/11/08, Surfer Chick wrote: > > Those of you who are suffering from unexplained fatigue, I am warning you not to seek the services of Dr. Nancy Klimas > because of what my experience has been with her. Surfing onto this to this Toxic Law message board, I am shocked by > what I am reading because I thought maybe this was just something that happened to ME. > I feel a moral obligation to share my story. People need to know before they travel to see a doctor what the doctor > is really all about; their ability to detect what your illness is, treat it and their moral obligation to care for you > and follow up with you. > My experience, I will first share my health history. > In 2003, I began having strange symptoms-- strange parathesia, swollen glands and lymph nodes, headache and high WBC. > By 2004, I had what I can only describe as electricity in my spine and brain, it was as if I was tied up to an > electrical grid and it was turned on to zap me. It was excrutiatingly painful. At the same time, I had strange joint > pain, joint pain that jumped from joint to joint and there were days when my feet hurt so bad, all I could do was > crawl. In addition to these symptoms, I have profuse sweating and hair loss along with abdomial pain and pain in my > lungs when I would breathe in deep and little by little fatigue along with a sick feeling came over me. At first it > was just once every few weeks, then it came more and more frequent until it just grabbed me and would not let go. > I saw a doctor who was of no help, but he gave me any pain medicine, anti anxiety or narcotic I asked for. > I had frequent trips to the ER during 04-06 where it was noted I had some type of "infection" I would also have horrid > bouts of vomiting and the runs. > I went to a few doctors who checked me for RA, Lupus but I didn't fit into these definitions of illness (they also > checked me for the worthless wastebasket diagnosis of "fibro" but I was not tender at all. No tender points anywhere. > My suffering continued and in April o7, I saw a specialist in the area of taste/smell because my taste and smell had > been gone for several months and now I had a feeling as if bugs were chewing at my flesh from inside, on my face, > neck, back, arms, chest, stomach, arms and legs and then swelling in my elbows began . > He and his junior resident had asked me questions for about 10 minuets and the attending told the resident that it > sounded as if I have Lyme Disease. I had not really heard of this before. He told me that I needed to find a doctor > who specializes in this because it was outside of his speciality. I followed his advice and two months later consulted > with a Lyme doctor. When I saw this doctor and went over my lab work and history, he said he thought I had Lyme > Disease and an infection Bartonella. He urged me to be tested for these infections right away and meanwhile gave me an > Rx for doxycycline. > Meanwhile, I did take the antibiotics for a short while but I discontinued them after I saw Dr. Klimas. > I consulted with Dr. Klimas as I wanted a full evaluation of my condition. I trusted that she would be qualified to > diagnose my situation, and besides I made the assumption that since she's well reknowned I should take her advice over > a doctor who is only known locally. My mistake. > When I saw Dr. Klimas in 07, my impression of her was favorable. She was very nice and laid back. Though I was > surprised that she didn't do a full exam and only ordered a few blood tests, I thought she had my back. I told her and > her assistant who was also very nice my entire history, including my visit to the Lyme doctor. Dr. Klimas was very > quick to tell me I didn't have Lyme and that most likely I have "CFIDS" but that I would get well in time. She told me > she could and would help me. I did feel at the time she wanted to help me. I recall telling my friends and father > about my appointment with her, that she made me feel safe and comfortable and that I would be OK in time. My father > was so pleased to hear of my visit that he thought it would be best if I relocated to Miami so I could see Dr. Klimas > regularly.My father wanted to purchase a condo in South Florida so I figured this sounded like a great idea. > I also told Dr. Klimas during my appointment that I would see her as often as what it takes to get well. > I left Miami feeling hopeful and with an Rx to get a sleep study, and to be checked for toxoplasmosis and mercury.I > had these tests done. The agreement I had with Dr. Klimas is that she would call me after the sleep study and the two > blood tests came back. She also ran an immune panel when I saw her. > > Meanwhile, I followed up with the Lyme doctor. He asked how the antibiotics went. I told him after about two weeks > first trying them, they made me feel like hell but that I discontinued them because I got a CFIDS diagnosis at > University of Miami. He told me he really thinks I have Lyme Disease so I should be tested. I got tested that day. Two > weeks later, my Western Blot came back CDC positive. I didn't know what to do at this time. I had finished the tests > Dr. Klimas had ordered and I was still waiting to hear back from her. I decided to get yet another opinion while I > waited to hear from Dr. Klimas. I found a rheumatologist on my insurance list. I got a quick appointment with the > Internal medicine doctor who worked with the rheumatologist. The Internist strongly felt I had Lyme but wanted to > retest and run other co infection tests along with other tests too. My tests came back positive for Lyme, Bartonella > and other infections. My ANA was also positive speckled. > I saw the rheumatologist and she too diagnosed Lyme disease. > Meanwhile, I got a call from Dr. Klimas but missed it so it went to my voice mail. She promised to call back that next > Tueday for a phone consult and told me that my blood work is back (that she had ordered) and that she has "A TREATMENT > PLAN" for me. > While I waited for her phone call, I had asked the lab to send Dr. Klimas all my blood work ordered by the other > doctors, plus I faxed her what copies I had available. > Tuesday came, no call. I assumed Dr. Klimas was busy. I gave it a week and then left a couple of messages. I heard > nothing.I really did not know what to do, I was really counting on Dr. Klimas. Leaving messages went on for two > months. Finally, a doctor from the University of Miami called me, a Dr. Lina Garcia. She identified herself as working > with Dr. Klimas and bluntly but politely told me "We don't treat Lyme Disease here" and suggested that I seek help > elsewhere and stop calling. I asked Dr. Garcia about my follow up, the results from the sleep study, and my TREATMENT > PLAN that Dr. Klimas had mentioned in my voice mail. Dr. Garcia stated "No treatment plan" and that I needed to go > somewhere else for help. Again, I asked about my follow up, that I flew out from California to see Dr. Klimas, etc. > All Dr Garcia had offered to do is comment about my hormone tests results (ordered from another doctor)looked low and > that she would ask Dr. Klimas to write a letter so I could take it to a gynecologist or endocrinologist. Dr. Garcia > also said she would try to get me a follow up appointment since I came across the coutry to see Dr. K. She left me her > e-mail address. I emailed her to ask about the follow up visit, a request for my records and the note. I got a reply > stating the note was in the mail and that I would get a follow up appointment. > I never got the note, never got the follow up. I called a total of 24 times! > If you want a doctor who is this unprofessional, go see Dr. Klimas. > My father thinks it's a blessing in disguise that she shirked her responsibility to care for me because her brand of > care is half assed. She never tested me for Lyme and co infections even though two other doctors suspected this is > what I had. She was quick to deliver her CFIDS diagnosis and quick to come up with a "TREATMENT PLAN" with only > running a handful of tests. She saw those test results and could not be professional and get back to me. If she didn't > want to treat the Lyme, I understand but she owed me the courtesy of follow up. Just imagine she had a treatment plan > which was most likely antidepressants for a person infected with bacteria. > I recall her words during my appointment about not having Lyme. > My experience begs the question, how many of her other patients came to her not tested for Lyme or God knows what but > gets the "CFIDS" diagnosis. > Thanks to this experience, my Lyme is even "later" treated. Going off the antibiotics, then trying to get back on was > difficult so I gave up.I have a doctor who cares about me now. Maybe I will get well someday. > I hope you can understand my disconnected post. I know it's a mess but I want to type it and get this out of my system > and not look back. > Please be careful what doctor you put your trust in. I never thought Dr. Klimas would just turn her back on me. I > thought she was so nice. > > > > > > > On 8/15/08, BE wrote: >> This is just typical Klimas. >> >> On 7/28/08, Former Klimas Patient wrote: >>> I call myself "Former Klimas Patient" but that's not fully accurate as she never did anything a good doctor would >>> do besides run a couple of her "CFS" type blood tests. You probably know the drill, the NK cells, HHV6 and EBV. >>> Never did she take the time to find out why I was so sick but that didn't stop her from giving me a CFS diagnosis >>> with no answers.I thought going to a university hospital they would pull out all the stops to find out the cause >>> of the fatigue but that didn't happen. >>> >>> Don't waste your time, energy or hard earned money traveling to see Dr. Klimas.I was snowed at first thinking she >>> was a caring woman doctor but really she cares about only her medical politics and government handouts. I had her >>> all wrong and I paid for it with my health declining thanks to her. Did she diagnose me correctly? No. When I >>> called her to leave information about the real cause of my "chronic fatigue" did she offer to help? Hell No! I >>> didn't get a phone call back from her. I must of left about 10 messages at least some on voice mail others with >>> the flighty secretary of hers.They never answer the phone.A very unprofessional medical practice. >>> Johnnie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/21/08, Seattle wrote: >>>> I saw her and what a mistake it was! Half-baked medical care and no in depth diagnostic tests, only a few blood >>>> tests.Very hard to reach by phone and those who work for her are unprofessional, she never returns calls. She >>>> missed what was the causative factor involved in my fatigue.I have a good doctor now that is not involved in CFS >>>> and that racket. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/16/08, Bruce wrote: >>>>> Has anyone seen Dr. Nancy Klimas at the University of Miami for chronic fatigue? Please write of your >>>>> experience. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/13/08, S wrote: >>>>>> Robert, >>>>>> You do make a good point but mold allergies are real and mainstream medicine knows that too. Lyme (not >>>>>> Lymes) is real but it's not well understood, though your point is well taken there are quacks out there who >>>>>> do diagnose such conditions with little proof and sell patients all this alternative garbage and promise >>>>>> them they will get better. >>>>>> "CFS", is a vague diagnosis doctors give when they lack the imagination to know what to do for these >>>>>> patients. Many times, it's hormonal, bacterial or viral but everyone is lumped together but Fibromyalgia is >>>>>> the champion of all quack conditions, just throw in the kitchen sink and this whopper of a so-called disease >>>>>> describes it all. What is unfortunate is those stuck with this pitiful diagnosis which is maninly a hormonal >>>>>> problem primarily in women with declining hormones and hypothyroid individuals. Too little is done about >>>>>> women's hormonal issues, but you're right, it attracts quack-pot fringe doctors and so-called mainstream >>>>>> doctors at universities who are on the payroll from big pharma.If you read the post above, the CFS doctor >>>>>> at Georgetown sounds like a quack too, just a different variety then those in the alternative world. >>>>>> I do want to add one thing worth mentioning, "mainstream" is not always correct. If you do your homework on >>>>>> history of medicine you will find what was once considered a "stress" issue with a psychological base, >>>>>> turned out to be real illnesses--such as RA, MS,bacterial ulcers--H-pylori. The doctor who discovered H- >>>>>> Pylori (Dr. Barry Marshall) was laughed at for decades by his peers, then he won the peace prize. >>>>>> Mainstream can be too ridgid and dogmatic in their aproach to understanding unknown disease--but quacks know >>>>>> this too and take advantage of people--THAT is the problem. When mainstream can't explain things, they blame >>>>>> psychology--that is a problem too. >>>>>> The best we can do is find open minded doctors who truly want to help others and not take advantage of the >>>>>> ill, or practice deceptive medicine. >>>>>> I said what's on my mind but I do think your points are valid. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/08/08, Robert Christ wrote: >>>>>>> I recommend that people google "how to spot a quack" One thing quacks always gravitate towards is >>>>>> conditions >>>>>>> that conventional medicine doesn't address like mold related illness, lymes, cfs, mcs, etc. Just because >>>>>>> they believe your condition is real doesn't qualify them to treat it. Many push vitimans and tox screens, >>>>>>> expensive blood test's that are irrelevant but boast their bill and give the patient the impression the dr >>>>>>> knows what he's doing. Many will sell you phony cures that supposedly "boast your immune system" or "remove >>>>>>> toxins" Shoemaker is one of the few that actually prescribes conventional medicine for an unconventional >>>>>>> purpose. I am not familer with the colosteral medication he prescribes but dubious of the claims he makes >>>>>> as >>>>>>> far as it's removing toxins, and especially dubious of the VCS test to measure its progress. Anyone who >>>>>>> knows different please correct me but I don't think the purpose he prescribes it for is recommended by >>>>>>> conventional or main stream MD's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ACMT has an article that refutes the mycotoxin connection to illness that shoemaker and others have been >>>>>>> touting. >>>>>>> http://www.acmt.net/cgi/page.cgi?aid=12&_id=52&zine=show >>>>>>> Particularly read the passage where they say that we consume way more mycotoxins in the food we eat by >>>>>>> orders of magnitudes than inhaled even in some of the worst mold contaminated buildings. So I am not >>>>>>> attacking the person, just his practices, and have evidence to back it up via the acmt document. Some will >>>>>>> say the science is payed for and bogus but this is not the MO of "paid for" science. They usually use straw >>>>>>> man arguments, or smoke and mirror tactics, or Plausible deniability like the ACOEM position paper which I >>>>>>> believe to be fairly accurate except where they claim MRI doesn't exist in the context of CFS which is >>>>>> flat >>>>>>> out wrong. >>>>>>> Needless to say very damaging to those that suffer from mold related illness. >>>>>>> http://www.acoem.org/guidelines.aspx?id=850 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ACMT on the other hand made a direct statement about a specific item, "mycotoxins" that could be >>>>>>> challenged if what they are saying were not true. But nobody has. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe mold related illness is much more complicated than the quacks make it out to be. I believe they >>>>>>> are cashing in on our misery and the professional witness fees they get. I have suffered from it for 12 >>>>>>> years and believe the only treatment that is effective is mold avoidance. The best bet for a sufferer >>>>>>> barring extreme measures is to find a relatively new house to live in with no history of water damage. You >>>>>>> don't need to pay Dr's like showmaker tens of thousands of dollars to come to this simple conclusion. Just >>>>>>> skip the middle man and save your money for the higher quality housing you need to control your mold >>>>>> related >>>>>>> symptoms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those that believe they suffer from lymes, MCS, CFS, etc. I would implore to make close observation to >>>>>>> their symptoms and their dwellings specifically to the degree of mold in them. Don't spend money on >>>>>>> expensive testing or remediation, your better to save it and put it towards higher quality new housing. >>>>>> If >>>>>>> you can find a friend or relative willing to let you stay with them (with a new house with no history of >>>>>>> leaks) for a month or two do this. Otherwise take the money you would spend on remediation and move into a >>>>>>> new clean house or apt. for a month or two, if the difference in your health is undeniably better "MOVE" >>>>>>> Craigslist.com has people with brand new homes looking to rent a room out, you can get into one of these >>>>>> for >>>>>>> about 600 a month. Less than one visit to shoemaker or any of the other ahem "alternative medicine >>>>>>> practitioners" and you will learn far more about your condition and how to treat it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Robert Christ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/27/08, mgfs wrote: >>>>>>>> First of all I would like to say I hope everyone suffering on this thread finds the answers and treatment >>>>>>> they need to feel well and whole >>>>>>>> again. After spending quite a bit of time with RS recently for a non clinical reason I would like to give >>>>>>> my thoughts on the man. He is one >>>>>>>> of the most immature egotistical self centered people I have ever met. He is a sensationalist capitalizing >>>>>>> on the pain and ignorance of >>>>>>>> others. And although I'm not a mental health pro I would lay money that he has borderline personality >>>>>>> disorder. He is about one thing >>>>>>>> and one thing only...lining the pockets of RS and pontificating the wonders of all things RS. All you have >>>>>>> to do is walk in his waiting room >>>>>>>> and observe "The Shrine" dedicated to the glory of RS to know there is something not right with this man. >>>>>>> My favorite part of "The Shrine" >>>>>>>> is an ad he has for a diet he made up that says something like "My way works, does yours?". Now what makes >>>>>>> this so funny is he is a very >>>>>>>> overweight man. Folks, use your head when it comes to this guy. if it looks like and smells like, it >>>>>>> probably is. >>>>>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- shoemaker, 10/08/03, by sacliff@msn.com.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/09/03, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/11/03, by sherrie.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/15/03, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/01/03, by Terry Elias.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/04, by Nancy Bramson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/10/04, by Teresa Greene.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/13/04, by Karen Parisis.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by Gloria Horsley.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by SD Teacher.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 4/12/04, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/03/05, by john biles.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/04/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/06/05, by Kay Bowers.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/07/05, by curious.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 1/31/05, by Jyl Burgener.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/01/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/02/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/05, by Janice.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/30/05, by v.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/12/05, by Andrea.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/22/05, by ZXR90.
- Re: shoemaker, 8/01/05, by Jim.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/10/05, by terry.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/27/05, by Marty Clarke.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/20/05, by Kurt D. Winterkorn.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker/Mr. Winterkorn, 12/21/05, by Tammy.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by v.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by TMV.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by A Griffith.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: FF, 1/11/06, by DD.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/21/06, by Pat Romanosky.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/06/06, by Holly.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/11/06, by ANDREE Tanner.
- Re: shoemaker, 11/27/06, by Craig.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/29/06, by NOT AMUSED.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/16/06, by Kay.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/29/06, by AmerAcadMed1.
- Re: shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/14/07, by Fanua SP. (SCUPS-Student).
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/13/07, by Cindy Fulghum.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 5/10/07, by David MacRae.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/13/07, by Tracy Hans.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/14/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 8/01/07, by dlpgppmi.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker--I'm not!!!!!, 9/09/07, by DC chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by DC CHICK.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by DC.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 10/02/07, by Cory .
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/20/07, by sick and tired.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey Schueck.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey WS.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker: One of a Kind, 10/21/07, by Erik Johnson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/23/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/04/07, by Rob.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/06/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/23/07, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/27/07, by Melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/27/07, by melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker/defending/clarity, 1/05/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 1/05/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/18/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by Tracy.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/27/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by ff.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 3/03/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 3/08/08, by JL.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 4/06/08, by Me2, another lymie.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 4/06/08, by me2.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/03/08, by Another CFS/CBT victim.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/25/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/17/08, by Tracy.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/27/08, by mgfs.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/30/08, by Paul B. Ross.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/08/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/13/08, by S.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/16/08, by Bruce.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/28/08, by Former Klimas Patient.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by BE.
- Re: June 23rd, 8/16/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/11/08, by Mary Ann.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with NO caveat, 9/11/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joanie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joani.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/21/08, by EnisP.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/11/08, by Surfer Chick.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/11/08, by Surfer Chick, Also........
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/12/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/19/08, by Maria.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/21/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/21/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Nancy Klimas, MD--MISDIAGNOSIS, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas doesn't test for Lyme Disease, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/01/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Nancy Klimas, MD--MISDIAGNOSIS, 11/21/08, by Pat.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/21/08, by Pat.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 11/21/08, by Pat.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 11/26/08, by johncodie.
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 1/17/09, by Cat Budak.
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 1/18/09, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 1/19/09, by Mike B..
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 1/19/09, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 1/19/09, by Mike B..
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 3/26/09, by TROB.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 5/27/09, by Diana.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 6/28/09, by Helen Rinde.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/01/09, by Pat Sullivan.
- Re: Dr. Leila Zachrison, 7/01/09, by Colleen.
- Re: Dr. Leila Zackrison, 7/01/09, by Colleen.
- Re: Dr. Leila Zackrison, 7/09/09, by SD.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 7/09/09, by S.
- Re: Shoemaker & Cholestryramine Therapy for Mold Illness, 7/09/09, by SD.
- Re: Re:CHINESE DRYWALL, 7/12/09, by HARVARD 708.
- Re: Re:CHINESE DRYWALL, 7/13/09, by Rem Dude.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 7/21/09, by kat shaw.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 7/21/09, by kat shaw.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 7/22/09, by CFSer.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/02/09, by Bric.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/10/09, by Patient.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/10/09, by bric.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/11/09, by Patient.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/11/09, by bric.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/28/09, by recovering mold pt..
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/28/09, by recovering mold pt..
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 8/29/09, by bric.
- Re: MCS factors, 8/29/09, by recovering mold pt..
- Re: MCS factors, 8/30/09, by bric.
- Re: MCS factors, 9/04/09, by recovering mold pt..
- Re: MCS factors, 9/08/09, by recovering mold pt..
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/11/09, by Pat Lassiter.
- Re: Shoemaker, 9/13/09, by Mold-Ill Patient.
- Re: William Rea MD, 9/28/09, by Lisa Nagy MD.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/09/09, by Pat Romanosky.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Shoemaker, 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 11/06/09, by Peterson.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/06/09, by Lee Robin.
- Re: Dr. Klimas is A Fantastic CFS / XMRV Physician, 11/06/09, by Lee Robin.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 11/08/09, by Feagles.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 11/17/09, by maggie k.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/09/10, by LRHH.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/09/10, by LRHH.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/09/10, by LRHH.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 1/18/10, by Confused.
- Re: Dr. Richie Shoemaker , 3/14/10, by Dottie.
|