Re: Dr. Wintercorn
Posted by v on 12/21/05
Hey guy! MERRY CHRISTMAS & HAPPY NEW YEAR. Same to every one else. Ya know, i may be wrong on this, i'm going back over 40 years. I thot it was Robo DC not ac, that had the kick. I'm tryin to rem.. AC was more benign, less potent. So i could see some one getting away with that with out any ill effects. On 12/21/05, ff wrote: > > I really appreciate the board now; it has helped in learning to be careful in > reaching conclusions, and to recognize that often times, even well-meaning people > that propose to have knowledge, really do not. It is not worth delving into, or > debating, as there are several basic, but significant flaws in the obvious attempt > to discredit Dr. Shoemaker. > > Setting aside the factual basis for exposure fo Wintercorn's distorted view, still > leaves the question as to whether Wintercorn himself, may be jealous of Dr. > Shoemeker - Wintercorn brought up the subject of jealousy. > > Without addressing specifics, recognize the award given to Dr. Shoemaker in recent > years - a Maryland MD of the year award. Get a life, Wintercorn, do something > good, take a break for the holidays... > > ff > > > On 12/20/05, Kurt D. Winterkorn wrote: >> I was his undergraduate college roommate at Duke, and he was a quack even back >> then. For fun and amusement, he used to drink whole bottles of Robitussin A-C >> (with codeine) at a time, and it's all been downhill since then. Some of his >> issues may have had to do with his competition for his mother's attention with >> his older brother Wells (who is also a physician, but I am told, not a quack). >> >> While doing his residency at Williamsport Hospital and Medical Center in > Lycoming >> County, Pennsylvania, he once introduced me on a visit to his workplace as a >> medical colleague and a researcher (I am in fact an attorney). Some patients >> with prescriptions for controlled substances written by Dr. Shoemaker found it >> difficult to get them filled at many pharmacies within a 50-mile radius of >> Williamsport - why that might have been, who knows? >> >> He then moved on to the DelMarVa peninsula to begin his private practice. One > of >> his former medical school associates, Dr. Tom Brennan, was in practice with him >> for a time, unless it all got to be too much for him and he cleared out for a >> saner locale, and apparently has never looked back. >> >> For an "interesting" read, check out his self-published book on pfisteria, which >> comes complete with wacky theories and inappropriate medical advice (I might > call >> it a novel, since much of it is fiction). After its publication, the CDC in >> Atlanta found it appropriate to issue a statement to the effect that "there is > no >> such syndrome as human pfisteria illness." >> >> The FDA warning letter can be found at: >> http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g4710d.htm >> >> Persons needing medical attention are urged to seek medical advice and treatment >> from large, reputable hospitals and reputable physicians in their local >> communities, and leave off searching the Internet, lest they find themselves in >> the care of some physician similar to Dr. Shoemaker. >> >> KDW, Alexandria, Virginia >> >> -------------Earlier thread-------------- >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Mr. Greg Weatherman, I have been following Shoemaker for quit >>>>>>> some time now and know several people he's treated. The bottom line is >>>>>>> that this doctor is dangerous. Don't believe me? He just recently >>>>>>> received a warning letter from the FDA about his prescribing the >>>>>>> veterinary drug Staphage Lysate to human beings. Need further >>>>>>> evidence? He treats Lymes Disease with Actos, a diabetic medication >>>>>>> and does not understand how it works. That's because, in all >>>>>>> likelyhood, it is voodoo medicine. To make matters worse, the >>>>>>> cholesterol medication CSM that binds bilesalts to stools is treated >>>>>>> for a neurotoxin that he's NEVER isolated, for mold related disorders >>>>>>> he can't proove. The reason Dr. Shoemaker is dangerous is because he >>>>>>> prescribes medication based soley on theory and not scientific fact. >>>>>>> He is a mad quack. This is a physican who believes that because he >>>>>>> treated a woman with CSM and her headaches and lethargy went away that >>>>>>> it MUST BE related to a toxin; which is all theory and quackery, which >>>>>>> is something he can't proove. In all likelyhood, the reason the first >>>>>>> woman's symptoms went away after he treated her with CSM is because >>>>>>> she was no longer DEHYDRATED from diarrhea and thus felt better. But >>>>>>> this is going to seem too simple to you. You're going to scoff at >>>>>>> this. Fine. Dr. Shoemaker needs to proove it. The bottom line is, he >>>>>>> can't. And in all patients, placebo-affect is known to transcend >>>>>>> thirty percent of patients who think and want to feel better and most >>>>>>> importantly, HEAR it from a doctor. He may very well have isolated a >>>>>>> Pfisteria outbreak in Pockomoke. Good for him. But the idea that he >>>>>>> has a thriving business now based upon the idea that most CFS is >>>>>>> caused by neurtoxins is ridiculous. There is no proof. He treats >>>>>>> patients as if they were lab animals at his beck and call, under the >>>>>>> guise that he is doing them a favor. The tone in your text, suggesting >>>>>>> that the cockroaches will run for cover makes me think that you are a >>>>>>> fan of his; that's fine if you wish, but remember something, he may >>>>>>> very well be wrong. >>> >>> Adding an "a" to the end of my name is childish. And I suggest to you that >>> you've taken too personally my criticisms of Dr. Shoemaker. And so you say >>> that writing is taught, eh? Well I've got news for you. First, I'm a >>> Registered Nurse with over 10 years hospital experience; the last five of >>> which are in Critical Care. And I've saved hundreds of lives, sir; many dying >>> from toxic related shock and septicemia. Secondly, I've brought people back >>> from the dead, have you? I've brought people back from the dead from my >>> running the codes and directing and giving orders without the help of >>> fumbiling doctors. Second, I'm in school for my master's degree and third, I'm >>> a published writer. Now that the educational discrepencies are out of the way >>> I'll say this. Dr. Shoemaker may very well be on to something, he may very >>> well be right. And I agree with you, that there are plenty of warning signs >>> out right now to suggest that mold causes human illness. I'm open to that. And >>> I'm also chronically aware that lest then two hundred years ago people new >>> nothing of Bacteria, let alone viruses and prions. The problem I have with Dr. >>> Shoemaker is that his treatment modalities are unproven. Every study I've read >>> on Choelystriamine conflict. I've even talked to a colleague of mine whose >>> Brother-In-Law helped design and pioneer Choleystiramine. Even he doesn't >>> know. And my wife is diagnosed by Dr. Shoemaker as having a neurotoxin >>> mediated illness from Aspirgillus. And the bottom line is this, I've >>> instructed my wife to stop Choleystiramine and drink water and eat healthier >>> and excericise on a daily basis; you know what? She feels even better than >>> before she started the drug. Here is another bottom line. Medicine is evidence >>> based, not theory based. Shoemaker treats without proof and ABOVE ALL, he >>> should not only be open to criticism, as should you, especially with unrpooven >>> modalities, but he should even welcome it. As any pioneering reasercher would. >>> It is not Shoemaker vs. the Establishment. His priorities should be isolating >>> the neruotoxin and then, with double blind, placebo-controlled groups, finding >>> a way to measure for the toxin level drop in blood, while detecting an >>> increase in feces. We can do that with Cholstridium. And so you don't know >>> anything about Dr. Shoemaker's warning letter, huh? Then do this, unless >>> you're afraid to. Bring up the Google web browser and type, in this order: >>> Shoemaker, Ritchie C. And there, in pretty blue letters, right at the tipy-top >>> of the page, will be his FDA warning letter about using the doggie medicine >>> Staphage Lysate on Humans. Woof-Woof!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- shoemaker, 10/08/03, by sacliff@msn.com.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/09/03, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/11/03, by sherrie.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/15/03, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/01/03, by Terry Elias.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/04, by Nancy Bramson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/10/04, by Teresa Greene.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/13/04, by Karen Parisis.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by Gloria Horsley.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by SD Teacher.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 4/12/04, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/03/05, by john biles.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/04/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/06/05, by Kay Bowers.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/07/05, by curious.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 1/31/05, by Jyl Burgener.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/01/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/02/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/05, by Janice.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/30/05, by v.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/12/05, by Andrea.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/22/05, by ZXR90.
- Re: shoemaker, 8/01/05, by Jim.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/10/05, by terry.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/27/05, by Marty Clarke.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/20/05, by Kurt D. Winterkorn.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker/Mr. Winterkorn, 12/21/05, by Tammy.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by v.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by TMV.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by A Griffith.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: FF, 1/11/06, by DD.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/21/06, by Pat Romanosky.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/06/06, by Holly.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/11/06, by ANDREE Tanner.
- Re: shoemaker, 11/27/06, by Craig.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/29/06, by NOT AMUSED.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/16/06, by Kay.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/29/06, by AmerAcadMed1.
- Re: shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/14/07, by Fanua SP. (SCUPS-Student).
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/13/07, by Cindy Fulghum.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 5/10/07, by David MacRae.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/13/07, by Tracy Hans.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/14/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 8/01/07, by dlpgppmi.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker--I'm not!!!!!, 9/09/07, by DC chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by DC CHICK.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by DC.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 10/02/07, by Cory .
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/20/07, by sick and tired.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey Schueck.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey WS.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker: One of a Kind, 10/21/07, by Erik Johnson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/23/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/04/07, by Rob.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/06/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/23/07, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/27/07, by Melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/27/07, by melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker/defending/clarity, 1/05/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 1/05/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/18/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by Tracy.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/27/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by ff.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 3/03/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 3/08/08, by JL.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 4/06/08, by Me2, another lymie.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 4/06/08, by me2.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/03/08, by Another CFS/CBT victim.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/25/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/17/08, by Tracy.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/27/08, by mgfs.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/30/08, by Paul B. Ross.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/08/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/13/08, by S.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/16/08, by Bruce.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/28/08, by Former Klimas Patient.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by BE.
- Re: June 23rd, 8/16/08, by Robert Christ.
|