Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker
Posted by Eric on 2/01/05
On 2/01/05, Greg Weatherman wrote: > Eric, > > You don't appear to comprehend very well what you read or you are self-obsessed > with your opinions. I have put the comments below each statement so you can > watch the bouncing red ball without getting lost. > > *************************************************** > > >> Adding an "a" to the end of my name is childish. And I suggest to you that >> you've taken too personally my criticisms of Dr. Shoemaker. And so you say >> that writing is taught, eh? > ************************************************************ > > I have known Dr. Shoemaker for 3 years. I think he is a fine person and a > doctor who will go to the ends of earth to find a way to help his patients > unlike the cattle promenade that is today's HMO run hospitals. I have referred > customers to him and they contact me later to thank me after they have some > normalcy to their lives. > > ************************************************************ > Well I've got news for you. First, I'm a >> Registered Nurse with over 10 years hospital experience; the last five of >> which are in Critical Care. And I've saved hundreds of lives, sir; many dying >> from toxic related shock and septicemia. Secondly, I've brought people back >> from the dead, have you? I've brought people back from the dead from my >> running the codes and directing and giving orders without the help of >> fumbiling doctors. > ***************************************************************** > I hear the music for "The Twilight Zone" playing in the background. FF is too > nice. You are an absolute nutjob and possibly dangerous in a healthcare > setting. I hope you will get counseling. > > **************************************************************** > Second, I'm in school for my master's degree and third, I'm >> a published writer. Now that the educational discrepencies are out of the way >> I'll say this. > > **************************************************************** > A masters in nursing is not even in the same hemisphere as a medical doctorate > before residency. You are not qualified to diagnose or treat illness. As far > as writing goes, writing on restroom walls is not to be confused with publishing. > > **************************************************************** > Dr. Shoemaker may very well be on to something, he may very >> well be right. And I agree with you, that there are plenty of warning signs >> out right now to suggest that mold causes human illness. I'm open to that. And >> I'm also chronically aware that lest then two hundred years ago people new >> nothing of Bacteria, let alone viruses and prions. > ****************************************************************** > > Pharmaceitical drugs are derived from toxins produced various forms of mold and > bacteria to suppress the immune system. What do your studies indicate the > occurence of these compounds do when they are aquired from the environment? > > ***************************************************************** > The problem I have with Dr. >> Shoemaker is that his treatment modalities are unproven. Every study I've read >> on Choelystriamine conflict. I've even talked to a colleague of mine whose >> Brother-In-Law helped design and pioneer Choleystiramine. Even he doesn't >> know. > > ***************************************************************** > Only you know the authorities since you are the only authority. I see a pattern. > ***************************************************************** > > And my wife is diagnosed by Dr. Shoemaker as having a neurotoxin >> mediated illness from Aspirgillus. And the bottom line is this, I've >> instructed my wife to stop Choleystiramine and drink water and eat healthier >> and excericise on a daily basis; you know what? She feels even better than >> before she started the drug. > > ***************************************************************** > > You are a nurse not a doctor. You have essentially practiced medicine without a > license. You have done this with your wife. You may hve a moldy home and do > not want the expense of fixing the moldy home so you stick your head in the sand > and deny. It is sad you have put your wife through this hell. If you want to > hurt yourself, fine. Leave others out of your destructive path. I bet > Aspergillis versicolor was the mold in question. > > ***************************************************************** > Here is another bottom line. Medicine is evidence >> based, not theory based. Shoemaker treats without proof and ABOVE ALL, he >> should not only be open to criticism, as should you, especially with unprooven >> modalities, but he should even welcome it. As any pioneering reasercher would. >> It is not Shoemaker vs. the Establishment. His priorities should be isolating >> the neruotoxin and then, with double blind, placebo-controlled groups, finding >> a way to measure for the toxin level drop in blood, while detecting an >> increase in feces. We can do that with Cholstridium. > > **************************************************************** > > First, we can't poison people to see if we can cure them. Dr. Mengele did this > type of research and was punished. I'm sure Dr. Mengele had some "delusions of > granduer" as well, Herr Eric. > > Second, "Koch's Postulates" don't work with toxins and allergens too well. He > did this with TB and Anthrax which are pathogens. Rat studies have been done > with fumonisin B and CSM. This is as close to "Koch's Postulates" as you can > get. > > **************************************************************** > And so you don't know >> anything about Dr. Shoemaker's warning letter, huh? Then do this, unless >> you're afraid to. Bring up the Google web browser and type, in this order: >> Shoemaker, Ritchie C. And there, in pretty blue letters, right at the tipy-top >> of the page, will be his FDA warning letter about using the doggie medicine >> Staphage Lysate on Humans. Woof-Woof! > > ***************************************************************** > Anyone can get this letter form the internet at: > > http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g4710d.htm > > It looks like a paperwork issue to me. He is still operating and doing research > under FDA rules. He must have had a need for a fine nurse such as yourelf > to "save" his patients from "fumbiling doctors". > > I have provided a link at the bottom of page. Look for the human clinical > trials mentioned back in 1994. Did your wife have a nasal inflamation and a > nose swab was positive for "methicillin resistant, coaglative-negative > Staphylococcus"? WOOF, WOOF? > > Take the hole pill, > > Greg Weatherman > aerobioLogical Solutions Inc. > Arlington VA 22202 > > gw@aerobiological.com > > ***************************************************************** The other day I took Dr. Shoemaker's treatment, and he turned me into a doggie. Woof! Woof! I'm just going to prentend Shoemaker is right because I need a hero. Woof! Woof! I'm a fan of Dr. Shoemaker's and also a Lord of the Rings Fan. Woof! Woof! Dr. Shoemaker hasn't treated any body CRITICALLY ILL or with SWANZ- GANZ catheters in over twenty years. Woof! Woof! Dr. Shoemkaer has the LEAST amount of training required to practice as a doctor. Woof! Woof! Dr. Shoemkaer treats LYMES disease with ACTOS, Woof! Woof! Every Doctor I've talked too, who has researched the issue, thinks he's a quack! Woof! Woof! I'm a technician at aerobioLogical Solutions Inc. Woof! Woof! I deliever the mail. And the bottom line, Mr. Greg Weatherman, is that I know a hell of a lot more about disease process and the anatomoy of the human body than you! Woof! Woof!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- shoemaker, 10/08/03, by sacliff@msn.com.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/09/03, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/11/03, by sherrie.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/15/03, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/01/03, by Terry Elias.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/04, by Nancy Bramson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/10/04, by Teresa Greene.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/13/04, by Karen Parisis.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by Gloria Horsley.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by SD Teacher.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 4/12/04, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/03/05, by john biles.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/04/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/06/05, by Kay Bowers.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/07/05, by curious.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 1/31/05, by Jyl Burgener.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/01/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/02/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/05, by Janice.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/30/05, by v.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/12/05, by Andrea.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/22/05, by ZXR90.
- Re: shoemaker, 8/01/05, by Jim.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/10/05, by terry.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/27/05, by Marty Clarke.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/20/05, by Kurt D. Winterkorn.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker/Mr. Winterkorn, 12/21/05, by Tammy.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by v.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by TMV.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by A Griffith.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: FF, 1/11/06, by DD.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/21/06, by Pat Romanosky.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/06/06, by Holly.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/11/06, by ANDREE Tanner.
- Re: shoemaker, 11/27/06, by Craig.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/29/06, by NOT AMUSED.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/16/06, by Kay.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/29/06, by AmerAcadMed1.
- Re: shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/14/07, by Fanua SP. (SCUPS-Student).
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/13/07, by Cindy Fulghum.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 5/10/07, by David MacRae.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/13/07, by Tracy Hans.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/14/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 8/01/07, by dlpgppmi.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker--I'm not!!!!!, 9/09/07, by DC chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by DC CHICK.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by DC.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 10/02/07, by Cory .
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/20/07, by sick and tired.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey Schueck.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey WS.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker: One of a Kind, 10/21/07, by Erik Johnson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/23/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/04/07, by Rob.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/06/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/23/07, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/27/07, by Melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/27/07, by melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker/defending/clarity, 1/05/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 1/05/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/18/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by Tracy.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/27/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by ff.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 3/03/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 3/08/08, by JL.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 4/06/08, by Me2, another lymie.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 4/06/08, by me2.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/03/08, by Another CFS/CBT victim.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/25/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/17/08, by Tracy.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/27/08, by mgfs.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/30/08, by Paul B. Ross.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/08/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/13/08, by S.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/16/08, by Bruce.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/28/08, by Former Klimas Patient.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by BE.
- Re: June 23rd, 8/16/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/11/08, by Mary Ann.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with NO caveat, 9/11/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joanie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joani.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/21/08, by EnisP.
|