Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas
Posted by Bad Experience on 8/15/08
Seattle, I had to laugh because Dr. Klimas does a few common tests of the immune system, sees that it's perked up but doesn't check why other than checking for EBV and HHV6.Immune dysfunction doesn't qualify as a diagnosis with much weight. She talks a good game about viruses to the patient but is a pet of the CDC and NIH. Grants and recognition comes first, not her patients. So she never returned you calls either, can't say I am surprised. What about the nit-wit she has for a secretary? Not good in following directions or answering calls either. What a terribly unorganized office! On 7/21/08, Seattle wrote: > I saw her and what a mistake it was! Half-baked medical care and no in depth diagnostic tests, only a few blood > tests.Very hard to reach by phone and those who work for her are unprofessional, she never returns calls. She > missed what was the causative factor involved in my fatigue.I have a good doctor now that is not involved in CFS > and that racket. > > > > > > On 7/16/08, Bruce wrote: >> Has anyone seen Dr. Nancy Klimas at the University of Miami for chronic fatigue? Please write of your >> experience. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/13/08, S wrote: >>> Robert, >>> You do make a good point but mold allergies are real and mainstream medicine knows that too. Lyme (not >>> Lymes) is real but it's not well understood, though your point is well taken there are quacks out there who >>> do diagnose such conditions with little proof and sell patients all this alternative garbage and promise >>> them they will get better. >>> "CFS", is a vague diagnosis doctors give when they lack the imagination to know what to do for these >>> patients. Many times, it's hormonal, bacterial or viral but everyone is lumped together but Fibromyalgia is >>> the champion of all quack conditions, just throw in the kitchen sink and this whopper of a so-called disease >>> describes it all. What is unfortunate is those stuck with this pitiful diagnosis which is maninly a hormonal >>> problem primarily in women with declining hormones and hypothyroid individuals. Too little is done about >>> women's hormonal issues, but you're right, it attracts quack-pot fringe doctors and so-called mainstream >>> doctors at universities who are on the payroll from big pharma.If you read the post above, the CFS doctor >>> at Georgetown sounds like a quack too, just a different variety then those in the alternative world. >>> I do want to add one thing worth mentioning, "mainstream" is not always correct. If you do your homework on >>> history of medicine you will find what was once considered a "stress" issue with a psychological base, >>> turned out to be real illnesses--such as RA, MS,bacterial ulcers--H-pylori. The doctor who discovered H- >>> Pylori (Dr. Barry Marshall) was laughed at for decades by his peers, then he won the peace prize. >>> Mainstream can be too ridgid and dogmatic in their aproach to understanding unknown disease--but quacks know >>> this too and take advantage of people--THAT is the problem. When mainstream can't explain things, they blame >>> psychology--that is a problem too. >>> The best we can do is find open minded doctors who truly want to help others and not take advantage of the >>> ill, or practice deceptive medicine. >>> I said what's on my mind but I do think your points are valid. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/08/08, Robert Christ wrote: >>>> I recommend that people google "how to spot a quack" One thing quacks always gravitate towards is >>> conditions >>>> that conventional medicine doesn't address like mold related illness, lymes, cfs, mcs, etc. Just because >>>> they believe your condition is real doesn't qualify them to treat it. Many push vitimans and tox screens, >>>> expensive blood test's that are irrelevant but boast their bill and give the patient the impression the dr >>>> knows what he's doing. Many will sell you phony cures that supposedly "boast your immune system" or "remove >>>> toxins" Shoemaker is one of the few that actually prescribes conventional medicine for an unconventional >>>> purpose. I am not familer with the colosteral medication he prescribes but dubious of the claims he makes >>> as >>>> far as it's removing toxins, and especially dubious of the VCS test to measure its progress. Anyone who >>>> knows different please correct me but I don't think the purpose he prescribes it for is recommended by >>>> conventional or main stream MD's. >>>> >>>> ACMT has an article that refutes the mycotoxin connection to illness that shoemaker and others have been >>>> touting. >>>> http://www.acmt.net/cgi/page.cgi?aid=12&_id=52&zine=show >>>> Particularly read the passage where they say that we consume way more mycotoxins in the food we eat by >>>> orders of magnitudes than inhaled even in some of the worst mold contaminated buildings. So I am not >>>> attacking the person, just his practices, and have evidence to back it up via the acmt document. Some will >>>> say the science is payed for and bogus but this is not the MO of "paid for" science. They usually use straw >>>> man arguments, or smoke and mirror tactics, or Plausible deniability like the ACOEM position paper which I >>>> believe to be fairly accurate except where they claim MRI doesn't exist in the context of CFS which is >>> flat >>>> out wrong. >>>> Needless to say very damaging to those that suffer from mold related illness. >>>> http://www.acoem.org/guidelines.aspx?id=850 >>>> >>>> ACMT on the other hand made a direct statement about a specific item, "mycotoxins" that could be >>>> challenged if what they are saying were not true. But nobody has. >>>> >>>> I believe mold related illness is much more complicated than the quacks make it out to be. I believe they >>>> are cashing in on our misery and the professional witness fees they get. I have suffered from it for 12 >>>> years and believe the only treatment that is effective is mold avoidance. The best bet for a sufferer >>>> barring extreme measures is to find a relatively new house to live in with no history of water damage. You >>>> don't need to pay Dr's like showmaker tens of thousands of dollars to come to this simple conclusion. Just >>>> skip the middle man and save your money for the higher quality housing you need to control your mold >>> related >>>> symptoms. >>>> >>>> Those that believe they suffer from lymes, MCS, CFS, etc. I would implore to make close observation to >>>> their symptoms and their dwellings specifically to the degree of mold in them. Don't spend money on >>>> expensive testing or remediation, your better to save it and put it towards higher quality new housing. >>> If >>>> you can find a friend or relative willing to let you stay with them (with a new house with no history of >>>> leaks) for a month or two do this. Otherwise take the money you would spend on remediation and move into a >>>> new clean house or apt. for a month or two, if the difference in your health is undeniably better "MOVE" >>>> Craigslist.com has people with brand new homes looking to rent a room out, you can get into one of these >>> for >>>> about 600 a month. Less than one visit to shoemaker or any of the other ahem "alternative medicine >>>> practitioners" and you will learn far more about your condition and how to treat it. >>>> >>>> Robert Christ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/27/08, mgfs wrote: >>>>> First of all I would like to say I hope everyone suffering on this thread finds the answers and treatment >>>> they need to feel well and whole >>>>> again. After spending quite a bit of time with RS recently for a non clinical reason I would like to give >>>> my thoughts on the man. He is one >>>>> of the most immature egotistical self centered people I have ever met. He is a sensationalist capitalizing >>>> on the pain and ignorance of >>>>> others. And although I'm not a mental health pro I would lay money that he has borderline personality >>>> disorder. He is about one thing >>>>> and one thing only...lining the pockets of RS and pontificating the wonders of all things RS. All you have >>>> to do is walk in his waiting room >>>>> and observe "The Shrine" dedicated to the glory of RS to know there is something not right with this man. >>>> My favorite part of "The Shrine" >>>>> is an ad he has for a diet he made up that says something like "My way works, does yours?". Now what makes >>>> this so funny is he is a very >>>>> overweight man. Folks, use your head when it comes to this guy. if it looks like and smells like, it >>>> probably is. >>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- shoemaker, 10/08/03, by sacliff@msn.com.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/09/03, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/11/03, by sherrie.
- Re: shoemaker, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/12/03, by ff.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 10/15/03, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/01/03, by Terry Elias.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/04, by Nancy Bramson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/10/04, by Teresa Greene.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/13/04, by Karen Parisis.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/04, by IanChristopher.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by Gloria Horsley.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/02/04, by SD Teacher.
- Re: sherri eseeking info, 4/12/04, by sherrie.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/03/05, by john biles.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/04/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/06/05, by Kay Bowers.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/07/05, by curious.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/25/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 1/29/05, by Eric.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: ERIC, 1/30/05, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, 1/31/05, by Jyl Burgener.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/01/05, by Eric.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/02/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 2/24/05, by suzanne mccavanagh.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/29/05, by Janice.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker - wow, i'm stunned, 3/30/05, by mary.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/30/05, by v.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/12/05, by Andrea.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/22/05, by ZXR90.
- Re: shoemaker, 8/01/05, by Jim.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/05, by Linda Lee Johnson.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: shoemaker, 9/14/05, by vivian.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/08/05, by ANN.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 10/10/05, by terry.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/27/05, by Marty Clarke.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/20/05, by Kurt D. Winterkorn.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker/Mr. Winterkorn, 12/21/05, by Tammy.
- Re: Dr. Wintercorn, 12/21/05, by v.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by ff.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by TMV.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 12/23/05, by A Griffith.
- Re: Re:Tammy/Mrs. Winterkorn, 12/23/05, by Greg Weatherman.
- Re: FF, 1/11/06, by DD.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: FF, 2/28/06, by Sue.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/21/06, by Pat Romanosky.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 5/06/06, by Holly.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 7/02/06, by ed cohen.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/11/06, by ANDREE Tanner.
- Re: shoemaker, 11/27/06, by Craig.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 11/29/06, by NOT AMUSED.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/16/06, by Kay.
- Re: shoemaker, 12/29/06, by AmerAcadMed1.
- Re: shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/13/07, by Claire.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 3/14/07, by Fanua SP. (SCUPS-Student).
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 4/13/07, by Cindy Fulghum.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker--BAD EXPERIENCE WITH DR. SHOEMAKER, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker, 5/01/07, by Virginia.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 5/10/07, by David MacRae.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/13/07, by Tracy Hans.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 6/14/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 8/01/07, by dlpgppmi.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 8/05/07, by john LaRocque.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker--I'm not!!!!!, 9/09/07, by DC chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by DC CHICK.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by dc chick.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/09/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by DC.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 9/16/07, by ff.
- Re: shoemaker, a real cruel stinker -- WRONG!!, 10/02/07, by Cory .
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/20/07, by sick and tired.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey Schueck.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/21/07, by Audrey WS.
- Re: Dr. Shoemaker: One of a Kind, 10/21/07, by Erik Johnson.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 10/23/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/04/07, by Rob.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 11/06/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker, Dr.Norton Fishman, A Better Choice, 12/01/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/23/07, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/27/07, by Melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/27/07, by melody.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ff.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 12/28/07, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Shoemaker/defending/clarity, 1/05/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 1/05/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/09/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/18/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/19/08, by Ticked Off.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: Defending Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/20/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by Tracy.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/22/08, by ff.
- Re: To FF/ Dr. Shoemaker, 1/27/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 2/22/08, by ff.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 3/03/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 3/08/08, by JL.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 4/06/08, by Me2, another lymie.
- Re: Shoemaker, better than CFS experts at Georgetown Uni, 4/06/08, by me2.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/03/08, by Another CFS/CBT victim.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Dr. James Baraniuk, 5/21/08, by Katie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 5/25/08, by Tracy.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/09/08, by Jill.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/17/08, by Tracy.
- Re: June 23rd, 6/27/08, by mgfs.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 6/30/08, by Paul B. Ross.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/08/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: June 23rd, 7/13/08, by S.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/16/08, by Bruce.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Shoemaker, better CFS doctor than Dr. James Baranuik GU, 7/21/08, by Seattle.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 7/28/08, by Former Klimas Patient.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by Bad Experience.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 8/15/08, by BE.
- Re: June 23rd, 8/16/08, by Robert Christ.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/11/08, by Mary Ann.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with NO caveat, 9/11/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joanie.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by Joani.
- Re: Defending Shoemaker with caveat, 9/14/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, 9/21/08, by EnisP.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/11/08, by Surfer Chick.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/11/08, by Surfer Chick, Also........
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/12/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/19/08, by Maria.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/21/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/21/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
- Re: Nancy Klimas, MD--MISDIAGNOSIS, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas doesn't test for Lyme Disease, 10/31/08, by Mass Lyme.
- Re: Dr. Nancy Klimas, A BAD EXPERIENCE , 11/01/08, by ErikMoldWarrior.
|