Re: Caoimhin: An issue and an audience = opportunity
Posted by ff on 1/08/04
johncodie:
It is probably that simple. I doubt that right or wrong, good
science or bad science matters. Taking a position in a
controversial issue which offers an audience, best explains
what is seen here.
ff
On 1/08/04, john codie wrote:
> The membership that gives him credibility has been trying to
> get him to conform to the guidelines that the EPA, New York
> Department Of Health has recommended for ripout. He has
> already gone on record in public form with informing his
> memberships president how wrong they all are, and that mold
> is not a problem, and should not be ripped out. I don't
know
> if you could call him an outcast since he is in a world of
> his own, but since he has no independent degrees with his
> name on them, sheep skins; he depends upon his associations
> to groups to justify what he sees as his credentials. Who
> awarded the man his credentials? They are figments in his
> own imagination. Most all hollywood actors are gifted in
> protraying their characters as a deeply religious man or
> women can protray, a druken salior, or halot of the night.
> We understand it is their job, and their job is to
> entertain. Same is true for Caoimhin, he is an actor, or
> clown as he protrays his character as this great scientist
or
> wonderful knowledge. He can probably come across in the
> field as superman. His problem he never picked up the
tools,
> nor the skills to put 2 plus 2 together to come up with
> four. He might be able to work some problems in statistics
> but we all know that that math can be manipulated by either
> including data, or excluding data to skew the precived
> problem, or conditions. Look real close to see if his IH
> degree if there is one is certifed by the state of Colorado
> to be practicing what he is preaching on the internet. I
> believe that is why he is working for a converted scientist
> that recently became a member of the American Board of
> Toxicology. As much as we have found the man in error
> concerning his other preceived areas of expertise, and he
> still desparatly needs to validate his character on this
> board. I have a diagnosis of his condition. It is called
> the Joe Newman Conolly syndrome. Do a public seach of Joe
> Newman, and you can see the similar traits in the actor gone
> wild.
>
> On 1/07/04, Fed up with the Caoimhin's of the world wrote:
>> I have spent the last six months searching the internet
>> (and other sources)to gain information on "toxic mold". I
>> have encountered several chat boards that address "toxic
>> mold". It seems Mr. Connell thinks it is his own
>> personnel mission to argue with anyone on the Internet
>> that believes in "toxic mold". I have found him on
>> several sites and each time he is saying that "we" are all
>> wrong and he is right. I question someone's motives (and
>> hidden agenda) who goes to such great lenghts.
>> Also, he must be an outcast in his own profession because
>> in September 2003, Industrial Hygentist's in the U.S.
>> ackowledged the existent of "toxic mold" and adopted
>> guidelines to deal with it.
Posts on this thread, including this one