Re: Caoimhin: An issue and an audience = opportunity

More | Report Post

It really is this simple Frank.

How many scientist do you know that have ever been able to give a
press release that has'nt previously been cleared by the employer?

On 1/08/04, ff wrote:
>
> johncodie:
>
> It is probably that simple. I doubt that right or wrong, good
> science or bad science matters. Taking a position in a
> controversial issue which offers an audience, best explains
> what is seen here.
>
> ff
>
>
> On 1/08/04, john codie wrote:
>> The membership that gives him credibility has been trying to
>> get him to conform to the guidelines that the EPA, New York
>> Department Of Health has recommended for ripout. He has
>> already gone on record in public form with informing his
>> memberships president how wrong they all are, and that mold
>> is not a problem, and should not be ripped out. I don't
> know
>> if you could call him an outcast since he is in a world of
>> his own, but since he has no independent degrees with his
>> name on them, sheep skins; he depends upon his associations
>> to groups to justify what he sees as his credentials. Who
>> awarded the man his credentials? They are figments in his
>> own imagination. Most all hollywood actors are gifted in
>> protraying their characters as a deeply religious man or
>> women can protray, a druken salior, or halot of the night.
>> We understand it is their job, and their job is to
>> entertain. Same is true for Caoimhin, he is an actor, or
>> clown as he protrays his character as this great scientist
> or
>> wonderful knowledge. He can probably come across in the
>> field as superman. His problem he never picked up the
> tools,
>> nor the skills to put 2 plus 2 together to come up with
>> four. He might be able to work some problems in statistics
>> but we all know that that math can be manipulated by either
>> including data, or excluding data to skew the precived
>> problem, or conditions. Look real close to see if his IH
>> degree if there is one is certifed by the state of Colorado
>> to be practicing what he is preaching on the internet. I
>> believe that is why he is working for a converted scientist
>> that recently became a member of the American Board of
>> Toxicology. As much as we have found the man in error
>> concerning his other preceived areas of expertise, and he
>> still desparatly needs to validate his character on this
>> board. I have a diagnosis of his condition. It is called
>> the Joe Newman Conolly syndrome. Do a public seach of Joe
>> Newman, and you can see the similar traits in the actor gone
>> wild.
>>
>> On 1/07/04, Fed up with the Caoimhin's of the world wrote:
>>> I have spent the last six months searching the internet
>>> (and other sources)to gain information on "toxic mold". I
>>> have encountered several chat boards that address "toxic
>>> mold". It seems Mr. Connell thinks it is his own
>>> personnel mission to argue with anyone on the Internet
>>> that believes in "toxic mold". I have found him on
>>> several sites and each time he is saying that "we" are all
>>> wrong and he is right. I question someone's motives (and
>>> hidden agenda) who goes to such great lenghts.
>>> Also, he must be an outcast in his own profession because
>>> in September 2003, Industrial Hygentist's in the U.S.
>>> ackowledged the existent of "toxic mold" and adopted
>>> guidelines to deal with it.

MCS/MCSS Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST