Follow us!

    Re: Caoimhin: An issue and an audience = opportunity

    Posted by ff on 1/08/04


    Applying the Deputy Dawg analogy, did Deputy Dawg ever see the
    need to exhibit professional conduct or follow procedure when
    drawing his weapon? I know this analogy is a good one because Mr.
    Connell commented that he enjoyed people shooting their feet, it
    saved him work.

    I would say he is hardly a scientist, possessing some knowledge
    does not make one a scientist. Trying to force convenient bits
    and pieces that he likes into something useable towards reaching
    the conclusion he demands, is that science?


    On 1/08/04, johncodie wrote:
    > It really is this simple Frank.
    > How many scientist do you know that have ever been able to give
    > press release that has'nt previously been cleared by the
    > On 1/08/04, ff wrote:
    >> johncodie:
    >> It is probably that simple. I doubt that right or wrong, good
    >> science or bad science matters. Taking a position in a
    >> controversial issue which offers an audience, best explains
    >> what is seen here.
    >> ff
    >> On 1/08/04, john codie wrote:
    >>> The membership that gives him credibility has been trying to
    >>> get him to conform to the guidelines that the EPA, New York
    >>> Department Of Health has recommended for ripout. He has
    >>> already gone on record in public form with informing his
    >>> memberships president how wrong they all are, and that mold
    >>> is not a problem, and should not be ripped out. I don't
    >> know
    >>> if you could call him an outcast since he is in a world of
    >>> his own, but since he has no independent degrees with his
    >>> name on them, sheep skins; he depends upon his associations
    >>> to groups to justify what he sees as his credentials. Who
    >>> awarded the man his credentials? They are figments in his
    >>> own imagination. Most all hollywood actors are gifted in
    >>> protraying their characters as a deeply religious man or
    >>> women can protray, a druken salior, or halot of the night.
    >>> We understand it is their job, and their job is to
    >>> entertain. Same is true for Caoimhin, he is an actor, or
    >>> clown as he protrays his character as this great scientist
    >> or
    >>> wonderful knowledge. He can probably come across in the
    >>> field as superman. His problem he never picked up the
    >> tools,
    >>> nor the skills to put 2 plus 2 together to come up with
    >>> four. He might be able to work some problems in statistics
    >>> but we all know that that math can be manipulated by either
    >>> including data, or excluding data to skew the precived
    >>> problem, or conditions. Look real close to see if his IH
    >>> degree if there is one is certifed by the state of Colorado
    >>> to be practicing what he is preaching on the internet. I
    >>> believe that is why he is working for a converted scientist
    >>> that recently became a member of the American Board of
    >>> Toxicology. As much as we have found the man in error
    >>> concerning his other preceived areas of expertise, and he
    >>> still desparatly needs to validate his character on this
    >>> board. I have a diagnosis of his condition. It is called
    >>> the Joe Newman Conolly syndrome. Do a public seach of Joe
    >>> Newman, and you can see the similar traits in the actor gone
    >>> wild.
    >>> On 1/07/04, Fed up with the Caoimhin's of the world wrote:
    >>>> I have spent the last six months searching the internet
    >>>> (and other sources)to gain information on "toxic mold". I
    >>>> have encountered several chat boards that address "toxic
    >>>> mold". It seems Mr. Connell thinks it is his own
    >>>> personnel mission to argue with anyone on the Internet
    >>>> that believes in "toxic mold". I have found him on
    >>>> several sites and each time he is saying that "we" are all
    >>>> wrong and he is right. I question someone's motives (and
    >>>> hidden agenda) who goes to such great lenghts.
    >>>> Also, he must be an outcast in his own profession because
    >>>> in September 2003, Industrial Hygentist's in the U.S.
    >>>> ackowledged the existent of "toxic mold" and adopted
    >>>> guidelines to deal with it.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.