Post: Peer reviewed Proof, Dr. Lipsey, etc.
Posted by Cheri on 2/21/04
Hi Everyone:
So, there are a few "smart" people out there that like to
jeer or want to join the knowledge pool. Maybe it is just
because the medical proof is truly there and it is going to
be used by victims of insurance companies, etc., that have
ignored the danger to the people that are in mold
environments.
I hope that anyone exposed to fungi and mycotoxins will
take the time to learn for themselves. Ignorance is bliss
as far as the attorneys go that are defending high-powered
companies and the insurance industry.
Dr. Lipsey has peer-reviewed papers that are published by
the U.S. Government so all the nonsense about him is
bogus. Even Melinda Ballard's case passed Daubert-Frye.
Check it out for yourself.
Note to all the attorneys that have been beating up the
victims: "If you can dish it you can take it."
On the matter of the Stachybotryus and CDC. The CDC never
said Stachybotryus did not cause the infant deaths. Their
reports have been largely misquoted by attorneys and the
media. Check it out for yourself.
Also, you might want to check out "empirical evidence" (an
accepted standard in the scientific field) IE "if it looks
like a rose, smells like a rose, then it must be a rose."
Try applying that to human damage from mycotoxins.
I don't know how many of you are aware of immune
suppression but virtually all medications made to suppress
the immune system after organ transplant are made from
fungi and there are a lot of studies on people developing
cancer afterward. If you are having immune suppression
trouble go Toxnet and look up IGA, Fungi for yourself.
You might want to check out the FDA as well. In one study
FDS states that after (fungal) exposure and a ten-year
latency period you (meaning people) have a two-fold to
three-fold chance of developing cancer (including several
types that are listed). 10yr = 2x or 3x times rate of
cancer.
Another thing I would like to point out is that the FDA
states that Rat Studies are the "Golden Rule." There are
other studies that say if something effects one species
then maybe, if it effects two species, Hmn. If it effects
several species then it definitely effects humans.
I, for one, am sick of the arrogance of attorneys and big
industry interests only caring about their bottom line "THE
DOLLAR" and not caring about the people supplying their
money. If my message saves one child from mold or one
person gets some desperately needed confirmation it is
worth it.
C
Posts on this thread, including this one