Re: Peer reviewed Proof, Dr. Lipsey, etc.
Posted by jeeter on 2/24/04
On 2/23/04, Cheri wrote:
> On 2/23/04, jeeter wrote:
>> On 2/21/04, Cheri wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone:
>>> Even Melinda Ballard's case passed Daubert-Frye.
>>> Check it out for yourself.
>> Um, sorry, but not. "Check it out for youself" - her experts
>> were not allowed to testify as to mold have any kind of
>> neurological health effects. What have you been reading?
>> BTW, the test is Texas is called "Robinson"
> You go check it out the proof is there. The Judge in Melinda's
> case did pass their experts for Daubert-Frye. There was
> another prior case ruling that was used to usurp Dauber-Frye.
Allison v. Fire Ins. Exchange
98 S.W.3d 227
Dec. 19, 2002.
"Ronald Allison, Ballard's husband, filed a separate appeal,
contending that the district court erred in granting FIE's motion
to exclude Allison's causation experts and in turn granting FIE's
no-evidence motion for partial summary judgment pertaining to
Allison's personal injury claims. Because we find no error in the
district court's rulings, we affirm the district court's rulings
in granting FIE's motion to exclude his causation experts and no-
evidence motion for partial summary judgment pertaining to
Allison's personal injury claims. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court's judgment dismissing Allison's personal injury
Posts on this thread, including this one