Follow us!

    Re: Acquired Intellect, does it lead to "truth"?

    Posted by DD on 7/27/04

    In Mary's world, people like me don't matter, consequently neither do our rights,
    constitutional or otherwise.
    She just gets a thrill out of stirring up the pot; like the bully in the school yard.

    On 7/25/04, ff wrote:
    > Mary,
    > Crazy discussions. However, TODAY, when defendants shirk responsibility by
    > claiming, after the fact, that they were not reliable (i.e. they're liars and
    > cheaters then) and therefore it is unreasonable that someone would rely on what
    > they say/represent, I have to wonder. That's about as nutty as some claim, some
    > sound here.
    > A statement on products such as "Purchase and use at your own risk. The
    > statements made here are not reliable. We lie, cheat, deliberately and with
    > conscience..." may not be so bad? Would it be better to know they're liars and
    > cheaters, before the fact, and therefore they cannot be reliable?
    > Of course, the nature of the product is important. Consider a such a statement on
    > your gardening tools versus baked goods versus pharmaceuticals?
    > A lot of lawsuits could be prevented if in DD's case for example, the landord were
    > to tell her in advance that he was a liar and don't believe anything he says or
    > writes or agrees to? Likely, DD would have gone elsewhere.
    > ff
    > On 7/25/04, mary wrote:
    >> Greetings from earth....
    >> Mary
    >> On 7/24/04, agree wrote:
    >>> On 7/16/04, v wrote:
    >>>> On 7/15/04, To Mary wrote:
    >>>>> On 7/14/04, Mary wrote: > Hey Brain Boy:>> Time to ask the nice man to take
    >>> you back to your room. Too much > computer time is bad for your oxygen
    >>> saturation. Remember to actually > SWALLOW your medication, don't just fake
    >> it.
    >>> Really enjoyed your post.>> Best Regards,>> Mary>> PS: I can see you through
    >>> your monitor when you type.> Don't judge others by same standard you are
    >>> beeing judged, it is only your personal problem and not the problem of
    >>> others. Virus Fraud
    >>>> To whom it may concern: re: viruses. i know nothing about biology, hell! i
    >>> cant even spell it. but from what i remember. bacteria & virus, are from two
    >>> different familys. not even related. from the picture i see, they look more
    >>> like bacteria. altho i have seen certain viruses under the microscope. they
    >>> resemble the picture. i know they have different shapes & forms. & certain of
    >>> them attack diffrent organs in the body. i find this all very interesting.
    >>> somone is saying we are being duped. let me guess! by the drug companys.
    >>> continue on. the more this goes, the more i learn. i dont discount anything.
    >>> untill i'm convinced other wise.
    >>> After reading all, hat we are being dupped.
    >>> It is not the first time the scam is pulled on all to make money.
    >>> It is uncommon that with such evidence judge gave the government official
    >> 8
    >>> months in jail for providing false informaton to general population that
    >>> HIV causes AIDS.
    >>> When yoiu compare the pics including EBOLA it looks like thaose are
    >>> some "other inconsistant shapes". Further even bacteria has consistant
    >>> while fungi don't.
    >>> So the thesis that AIDS is caused by a fungi better fits the picture
    >>> than the NEVER found retrovirus.
    >>> I found this reading fascinating.
    >>> It only shows that the American Sociaety is really suffering from
    >>> Missing intelligence gene, and the Acquired Intelligence Defficiency
    >>> Syndrome fits well all so called experts.
    >>> Fungi lives of oxygen and this could explain the extreme tiredness as
    >>> LANKA named it Acquired Energy eficiency Syndrome.
    >>> The poster Mary well fits the discussed profile of mising intelligence
    >>> gene. Rather than reading and trying to understand she reads the boittom
    >>> of the coffee ....
    >>> Can you
    >> spot
    >>> the 'real HI Virus' among these images?

    >>> Does HIV exist at
    >>> all? What about the HIV- genome?
    >>> HIV researchers believe the AIDS virus looks like this; like a bomb or water
    >>> (blood) mine. This model is based on the detection of cellular particles in
    >>> cell lines under very special conditions. Such particles never have been
    >>> isolated or somehow else demonstrated to exist as a virus or be of viral
    >>> origin. This is nothing but a modell based on a collection of proteins of
    >>> various size (no other characterization!) which by antibody detection (known
    >> as
    >>> HIV- or AIDS-test) have been chosen to be said to represent parts of HIV
    >>> according to the ill-minded and false concept of retroviruses and how they
    >>> should look like.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.