Re: Recall: nasal spray decongestant
Posted by dd on 3/24/04
Found it on sbc, "aureobasidium pullulans" On 3/24/04, dd wrote: > No, and I looked it up! Can't find the post, either. > On 3/21/04, ff wrote: >> >> >> Clarification: >> >> The investigation referred to below was in Florida and not >> related to the Colorado incident. >> >> ff >> >>> DD: >>> >>> Yes, it was recalled due to contamination with pseudomonas, >>> whoops!, Burkholderia cepacia. >>> >>> Pseudomonas aeruginosa was an organism intended to be included >>> in the investigation by the state (AEROTECH was the >>> contractor). >>> >>> ff >>> >>> >>> I was On 3/21/04, dd wrote: >>>> I have no idea, but I had walking pnuemonia after >>> exposure. >>>> I refused to take the nasal decongestants that were given >>> to >>>> me because my symptoms got much worse after one dosage. >>>> Most of these sprays contain steriods of some sort and that >>>> is an immune system supressant. Saline water is best. Guess >>>> I'll get the pharmacy company nazis after me now. Just >>>> kidding, sort of. >>>> >>>> Are you referring to the nasal spray itself being >>>> contaminated with this bacteria? >>>> >>>> You are speaking to someone who has been poisoned with >>>> chlordane twice, once by landlord who worked at chemical >>>> company and the other time by Terminex. Dioxin and a couple >>>> of others were in the mix. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/21/04, ff wrote: >>>>> DD: >>>>> >>>>> The product was recalled after a hospital in Colorado >>>>> reported infections and found Burkholderia cepacia, in the >>>>> product. >>>>> >>>>> DD, in your research maybe you could find why this >>>>> organism, pseudomonas, was renamed Burholderia cepacia. >>>>> It is also a common plant pathogen, and that's where I >>>>> first saw the name change. Research indicates that a >>>>> common fungicide routinely applied to soil (and >>>>> incorporated into paints, coatings, and materials) causes >>>>> shifts in populations to dominance by pseudomonas. >>>>> >>>>> Is pseudomonas on your list of microbes tested for? I'd >>>>> place pseudomonas into the group of ignored pathogens in >>>>> IAQ situations, along with fusarium and cyanobacteria. >>>>> One agency's theory was that the three flourish after >>>>> chemical application. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ff
Posts on this thread, including this one
|