Re: WHAT A SMELLY WORLD! ff

More | Report Post

On 4/17/04, ff wrote:
>
> ohlou:
>
> Archaic? Possibly. I had not heard the new terms for ambulance
> chaser, thanks. However, it does imply participation by the
> paramedics.
>
> ff
> On 4/14/04, ohlou wrote:
>> On 4/13/04, mary wrote:
>>> Hello ff:Let's discuss part of what you have said:"Another
> complicating factor is that, as legitimate as it may be, only those
> that have experienced it can understand or believe it."Okay, now
> what is your basis for this statement? We see things like this all
> the time here, but no factual support is offered. Have you done some
> research on this? Have studies been published? A survey perhaps? Is
> this something that can be, or has been, quantified? I know you
> embrace the scientific method, so let's hear more about this
> please.Best Spring Regards and hope the day finds you well.MaryOn
> 4/13/04, ff wrote: >>> Yeah, it says a lot. I've always said that
> as many > individuals experience environmental illnesses, it's their
>> first time of entering into other disciplines, fields of >
> expertise, science, whatever. Each one of these individuals >
> sounds nuts. In total, as a 'group' they discredit and > destroy
> hope of credible, capable scientists ever gaining > legitimate
> interest in the subject. >> Another complicating factor is that, as
> legitimate as it may > be, only those that have experienced it can
> understand or > believe it.>> Finally, it goes back to cause and
> effect, and the lack of any > hope of immediate feedback. If people
> fell over dead every > time they had an exposure (the same
> exposure), or fell over > dead everytime thay walked into the same
> building, it would > not be long before they concluded "something"
> was present and > it will kill you. With MCS, mold, etc., most
> affected people > look OK to everyone else, they're not falling over
> dead.>> Compare it to a severe automobile accident, and rolling he >
> victim into the courtroom all mangled up, in traction, limbs >
> missing, etc. Now that's something that can easily be seen -> "Oh
> my God, look at that poor injured person, damn near dead">> OK Mary,
> it's easy to see why an ambulance chaser could be all > that's
> required to win big in PI cases. >> FF>
>>
>>
>> ff- AMBULANCE chaser???? How archaic of you. I believe the
> proper term these days would be "paramedic response vehicle
> chaser" ......ohlou

ff- Yeah, I know, I just made it up but no reason to get the paramedics
involved. How about ...medical emergency response vehicle chaser...
Mary- I'm the goof; not ff.
.....ohlou

ToxBoard (Gen) Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST