Re: Mold Poisoning/Need Attorney In NV.
Posted by Sean on 9/27/06
Ok Johncodie you are so full of it. If you knew a damn thing
about causes and the effects of this specific mold maybe then you
could coment. First the Video was edited so much it did not show
nearly anything that actualy happened. Do you realy think that
they aired raw footage? Wake up. Don't presume to know anything
that we have been through or are going through. The toxin put out
by this mold attacks the central nervous system and the lungs as
well as causing many other problems."strawberry patterns to
cheeks, no nasal discharge" get real he is haveing respritory
shut down, seizures, and not a runny nose. Know what you are
talking about befor you say anything as ignorent at what you said.
Dr. Lipsey my sons new doctor " the best in the country" Is
qualified and and an expert on the subject.
On 9/27/06, Johncodie wrote:
> On 9/24/06, Sean wrote:
>> On 7/14/06, Toni wrote:
>>> I need an attorney here in Las Vegas, NV. to represent me
>>> in a toxic mold poisoning case. The owner of the apartment
>>> where I contracted the mold poisoning has stopped paying
>>> for my medication. Can anyone refer me to a lawyer to
>>> represent me here in Las Vegas, NV.
>>> Thank you, Toni.
>> Toni contact me by email I have resources to help you.
> You need something more than a good attorney, you need a good
> media relations person. Unless your willing to put up your
> own money, ie. 10K to 20K your chances of being represented on
> his/her money are slim. Attorneys seldom invest their time and
> money unless there is a death, or gross apparent negligence of
> someone with large pockets.
> You have been dis-serviced by having the news media provide
> your child's health to the public at large. I made specific
> request of the local news media, (a demand) to not contact,
> film, or have any contact with my children concerning their
> previous home, of mold. One news paper article did provide a
> source of connection to an attorney that did want to share
> information concerning our toxicologist. The children do not
> need to bear the burden of scrutnity by the public.
> What I saw from the news story that others my see that goes
> against you in your claim.
> 1. The child did not appear to have any distress symptoms
> normally associated with what is experienced from a first
> responder. See Red Cross guidelines of how to
respond.strawberry patterns to cheeks, no nasal discharge
> 2. Who appeared to be the child's mother seemed to be too calm
> of a child that is in need of immediate life threating.
> 3. The child was not having difficulty breathing as to an
> allergic reaction. There was no red spots, alergic reaction,
> strawberry patterns to cheeks, no nasal discharge, no tears
> 4. The vital signs of the patient were displayed as the first
> responders were taking the child away. There were not one of a
> patient in distress.
> 5. The child appeared to be responding, innocently to a
> parents request for an illness. Either verbally or unverbally.
> 6. The father did not appear to be hesterical as to the childs
> health being in serious danger of death.
> 7. The child was given oxygen but did not appear to be oxygen
> 8. The mold shown on the apartment inspection appeared to be
> normal levels that are commonly found. By comparison to
> Katrinia exposure as deaths are for elderly compromised, the
> child appears to be influenced by protective parents. The
> close supervision these days necessitated by predators does not
> allow children to develop normal outside healthy immune systems.
> 9. Who appeared to be childs mother was not interviewed with
> the father. Why not a common front, she was at the occurence
> of child's life threating event. How did the mold from the
> appartment trigger what happened outside? What was the
> lingering affect by inside appartment, ot outside months, or
> years latter?
> 10. The father appears to be well maintained, high manintenace
> husband, (it goes both ways), not a gray hair, not a hair out
> of place, perfect smile, etc. etc. Appears to be looking for
> the next money train.
> 11. Will either respond to provide more detail information to
> general public, or will take my advice and cut your losses.
> Apartment group was good to provide as much as they did.
Posts on this thread, including this one