Re: Dr. Richard Lipsey - SPAMMER
Posted by Sharon on 1/26/07
This thread needs to be put to bed. It is getting confusing, cross
referencing and hard to tell who is quoting who.
For the record, I never wrote the following. These are not my words:
> On 1/24/07, Sharon wrote:
> "Irritated is not far off the mark. Ira Besserman is looking for free
> information on Dr. Lipsey or is Dr. Lipsey casting the stone in the
> internet waves for a little more ripple effect."
On 1/26/07, Angel wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Johncodie wrote:
>> On 1/24/07, Sharon wrote:
>> Irritated is not far off the mark. Ira Besserman is looking for free
>> information on Dr. Lipsey or is Dr. Lipsey casting the stone in the
>> internet waves for a little more ripple effect.
> Oh please let it go. Personally knowing Dr. Lipsey, EVEN I had to WAIT
> for him to review my documents and I AM a paying client. This is a man
> who DOES NOT need to work at his age, but, does it to help those who are
> injured as he CARES, a CONCEPT lost by probably most of the other so
> called 100's of other "qualified toxicologists" that had been previously
> referenced. The need to create a "RIPPLE EFFECT" is so far off the mark.
> Richard is in
>> the public eye and face it being held to a higher standard. Not asking
>> for credentials just current billing rates. The public should have
>> knowledge of what was described as the best in the business going to
> FACT: His rates start at $300.00/hour. Every dollar charged is
> documented and not padded in any way shape or form. He is notorious for
> not charging for EVERY time he works on a clients file. His retainers go
> a long way. Which is a VERY REASONALBE rate if you would research the
> 100's of OTHER so called expert toxicologists. A hell of a LOT cheaper
> than egocentric litigators, where the old agade "talk is cheap until you
> talk to an attorney" is confirmed.
> FYI, my ISP is thru Go Daddy for my foundation, thank you very much.
> Now, are you in contact with EVERY one of your close associates? I
> sincerely doubt it, and if Richard and Jack drop a quick note to each
> other why the big bruhaha over it? At least they are not emulating
> sacral-cranial inversion which seems to be running rampant on this
> particular thread.
> Apparently, those who are answering EVERY post have way too much time on
> their hands and that equates to being a failure in their chosen field of
> endeavor. I heard about this thread thru my environmental contacts and
> figured I needed to put my $0.99 (with inflation)in and try to shut up
> the malcontents who are out to try and destroy someone's hard earned
> reputation. Or are these naysayers, competitors who are looking to
> discredit the man, figuring they could try to snare some new business?
> To those who are shooting their buccal cavity off, why not post who you
> REALLY are and lets see YOUR qualifications or lack thereof.
> Doing a websearch on "John Codie" there is NOTHING that correspondes to
> someone who should be interested in this chat board.
> I ask you...Post your CV or website and let us see the "man behind the
Posts on this thread, including this one