Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by ff on 11/20/07
There's probably a reason why it seems that way to you, and also
why you had to do a double take. What's the matter? You a
little off today, did you leap before you read? Can't you
address/post without attacking?
I presented two scenarios. Neither were mine, but suffice it to
say that you flunked. You're too easy. Forget it, your done.
On 11/20/07, Mike B. wrote:
> Actually, on second take, you're response below seems strongly
> racist to me.
> On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
>> Mike B.:
>> The rest of the story could be...?
>> ...the litigants, now overweight, intoxicated, and homeless,
>> are suing to regain possession of the truck, clothes, and
>> jewelry purchased with proceeds from the settlement. A
>> major convenience store chain is also being sued for
>> accepting purchases from them, with cash also obtained in
>> the settlement, as well as a local business, "Custom Body
>> and Paint". The auto customizing facilitiy allegedly
>> mispelled the first name of one of the litigants, when it
>> was painted onto the now repo'd vehicle. The previous
>> landlord declined comment, stating that the litigants were
>> threatening discrimination suits if he did not allow them to
>> move back into the apartment, employ then to make necessary
>> repairs, and compensate with cash only.
Posts on this thread, including this one