Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by ff on 11/20/07
Crawfishing? What does that mean, Mike B.?
On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
> Mike B.:
> Not the case, Mike B. Anything but. It was a strategy to draw you out,
> and it worked. Two conflicting scenarios presented, and you jumped too
> quick. From years of posts on this board, and my life in general,
> nothing could be seen as further from the truth. That's why regular,
> legitimate posters did not say anything...they knew something was up
> when I posted, but you didn't.
> Now, you are exposing yourself, based on this strategy, yet refusing to
> admit you've been had. Call me whatever you want. You've been had.
> You fell for it. Admit it. First you jumped to one conclusion, posted,
> then went back and read it over, saw the inconsistency where you fell
> for only one scenario, and you've been backing up ever since.
> Just like Sharon said, and as proven here now, you continually react and
> respond, negatively, without first, reading. You need help. You can't
> handle it alone. You're a stalker, your'e creepy, you creep out DD,
> others, I'll bet? Digging into irrelevant personal issues, get off your
> daddy's computer and grow up, seek help.
> On 11/20/07, Mike B. wrote:
>> Your comments below are remniscent of your crawfishing on your threats
>> against me to kick my a**.
>> Your comments about "overweight, intoxicated" plaintiffs getting
>> their "repossessed cars and jewelry" and "custom paint jobs" are very
>> telling about your disdain for a certain group of people.
>> The red on your neck is really showing.
>> On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
>>> To the contrary, contrary Mike B.
>>> As is typical, you didn't read it, you jumped, you tried to correct
>>> it, and having screwed up, you resort to the tactics we see below in
>>> your post. You were too easy to draw out, the sooner you admit to
>>> yourself what just happened to you, the better off you'll be. Now,
>>> I said admit to yourself, it's obvious to me, and probably everyone
Posts on this thread, including this one