Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by ff on 11/21/07
First, you reacted with "what's the matter, ff, jealous?".
Next, as below, "Actually, on second take".
Second take - you bet! You looked at it again, read it, and
realized you mouthed off without knowing what you were even
responding to. So what did you do? You tried to BS your way
through it by referring to "your response below", which is not
my reponse at all
YOU CHANGED IT, TO CREATE A DEFENSE FOR YOURSELF, YOU LEFT OUT
THE WORD "OR", Then, you began to try and capitalize off of your
On 11/20/07, Mike B. wrote:
> Actually, on second take, you're response below seems strongly
> racist to me.
> On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
>> Mike B.:
>> The rest of the story could be...?
>> ...the litigants, now overweight, intoxicated, and homeless,
>> are suing to regain possession of the truck, clothes, and
>> jewelry purchased with proceeds from the settlement. A
>> major convenience store chain is also being sued for
>> accepting purchases from them, with cash also obtained in
>> the settlement, as well as a local business, "Custom Body
>> and Paint". The auto customizing facilitiy allegedly
>> mispelled the first name of one of the litigants, when it
>> was painted onto the now repo'd vehicle. The previous
>> landlord declined comment, stating that the litigants were
>> threatening discrimination suits if he did not allow them to
>> move back into the apartment, employ then to make necessary
>> repairs, and compensate with cash only.
Posts on this thread, including this one