Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by ff on 11/21/07
On 11/21/07, ff, not Mike B,: > > Mike B.: > > Now, take a look below at how my post really read: Do you see > the word "OR", separating the two scenarios???? It's obvious > why you left it out. First, that was the only way you could > get out of your first reaction when you realized you screwed > up. Secondly, you didn't like the way the second scenario on > the industry side read, you got rid of it and the word "Or" > and lastly, you obviously liked the sound of the first > scenario, and you left it in. > > Mike, like I said, I don;t ever expect you to admit your > wrong, and I don't care if you do or not. You're caught, and > I'm done here. Like I said, "light work". > > Altering the post, and then submitting the alteration while > agrguing and calling me names, etc. I love it. > > WE"RE DONE HERE! > > ff > > On 11/20/07, ff wrote: >> >> Mike B.: >> >> The rest of the story could be...? >> >> ...the litigants, now overweight, intoxicated, and homeless, >> are suing to regain possession of the truck, clothes, and >> jewelry purchased with proceeds from the settlement. A >> major convenience store chain is also being sued for >> accepting purchases from them, with cash also obtained in >> the settlement, as well as a local business, "Custom Body >> and Paint". The auto customizing facilitiy allegedly >> mispelled the first name of one of the litigants, when it >> was painted onto the now repo'd vehicle. The previous >> landlord declined comment, stating that the litigants were >> threatening discrimination suits if he did not allow them to >> move back into the apartment, employ then to make necessary >> repairs, and compensate with cash only. >> >> Or - >> >> ...the litigants' state of health has continued to decline, >> while at the same time, the previous landlord has leased the >> contaminated property to more families, claiming that the >> CDC, US Chamber of Commerce, ACOEM, and other credible >> entities stand behind him in his accepted view that mold is >> harmless. >> >> ff >> >> On 11/19/07, Mike B. wrote: >>> What are ya'll doing wrong with your litigation? >>> >>> Apartment Mold >>> Oakland, CA: (Nov-18-07) Twelve immigrant families who >>> lived in a dilapidated, unheated, mold and cockroach >>> infested apartment, brought charges against their >> landlord, >>> Roosevelt Owyang, accusing him of not providing a >> habitable >>> dwelling at the complex. The suit also alleged breach of >>> contract. The former tenants stated that rain water leaked >>> into their apartments from windows and ceilings so the >>> apartments were constantly damp and mold was thick. >>> Cockroaches were everywhere, and stairway railings and >>> floorboards were often broken. Several plaintiffs claimed >>> that they developed asthma along with the 39 former and >>> current residents who are party to the suit. Several >> others >>> claimed that they suffered from chronic sinusitis and >> upper- >>> respiratory problems as a result of staying at the >>> apartment. The complaint was filed in state Superior Court >>> in Alameda County. As part of a settlement reached, the >>> twelve immigrant families received a $1.3 million payout, >>> resolving the lawsuit. [INSIDE BAY AREA: APARTMENT MOLD]
Posts on this thread, including this one
|