Re: Another Mold Settlement

More | Report Post

Geez1 Now you're a frickin' mind reader.

See my immediately previous post regarding "your response below"
(qualifier).

On 11/21/07, ff wrote:
>
>
> Mike B.:
>
> First, you reacted with "what's the matter, ff, jealous?".
> Next, as below, "Actually, on second take".
>
> Second take - you bet! You looked at it again, read it, and
> realized you mouthed off without knowing what you were even
> responding to. So what did you do? You tried to BS your way
> through it by referring to "your response below", which is not
> my reponse at all
>
> YOU CHANGED IT, TO CREATE A DEFENSE FOR YOURSELF, YOU LEFT OUT
> THE WORD "OR", Then, you began to try and capitalize off of your
> deception.
>
> ff
>
>
> On 11/20/07, Mike B. wrote:
>> Actually, on second take, you're response below seems strongly
>> racist to me.
>>
>> On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike B.:
>>>
>>> The rest of the story could be...?
>>>
>>> ...the litigants, now overweight, intoxicated, and homeless,
>>> are suing to regain possession of the truck, clothes, and
>>> jewelry purchased with proceeds from the settlement. A
>>> major convenience store chain is also being sued for
>>> accepting purchases from them, with cash also obtained in
>>> the settlement, as well as a local business, "Custom Body
>>> and Paint". The auto customizing facilitiy allegedly
>>> mispelled the first name of one of the litigants, when it
>>> was painted onto the now repo'd vehicle. The previous
>>> landlord declined comment, stating that the litigants were
>>> threatening discrimination suits if he did not allow them to
>>> move back into the apartment, employ then to make necessary
>>> repairs, and compensate with cash only.
>>>
>>>>
>>> ff
>>>