Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by Mike B. on 11/21/07
Ditto to your ditto.
On 11/21/07, ff wrote:
> On 11/21/07, ff, not Mike B,:
>> Mike B.:
>> Now, take a look below at how my post really read: Do you see
>> the word "OR", separating the two scenarios???? It's obvious
>> why you left it out. First, that was the only way you could
>> get out of your first reaction when you realized you screwed
>> up. Secondly, you didn't like the way the second scenario on
>> the industry side read, you got rid of it and the word "Or"
>> and lastly, you obviously liked the sound of the first
>> scenario, and you left it in.
>> Mike, like I said, I don;t ever expect you to admit your
>> wrong, and I don't care if you do or not. You're caught, and
>> I'm done here. Like I said, "light work".
>> Altering the post, and then submitting the alteration while
>> agrguing and calling me names, etc. I love it.
>> WE"RE DONE HERE!
>> On 11/20/07, ff wrote:
>>> Mike B.:
>>> The rest of the story could be...?
>>> ...the litigants, now overweight, intoxicated, and homeless,
>>> are suing to regain possession of the truck, clothes, and
>>> jewelry purchased with proceeds from the settlement. A
>>> major convenience store chain is also being sued for
>>> accepting purchases from them, with cash also obtained in
>>> the settlement, as well as a local business, "Custom Body
>>> and Paint". The auto customizing facilitiy allegedly
>>> mispelled the first name of one of the litigants, when it
>>> was painted onto the now repo'd vehicle. The previous
>>> landlord declined comment, stating that the litigants were
>>> threatening discrimination suits if he did not allow them to
>>> move back into the apartment, employ then to make necessary
>>> repairs, and compensate with cash only.
>>> Or -
>>> ...the litigants' state of health has continued to decline,
>>> while at the same time, the previous landlord has leased the
>>> contaminated property to more families, claiming that the
>>> CDC, US Chamber of Commerce, ACOEM, and other credible
>>> entities stand behind him in his accepted view that mold is
>>> On 11/19/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> What are ya'll doing wrong with your litigation?
>>>> Apartment Mold
>>>> Oakland, CA: (Nov-18-07) Twelve immigrant families who
>>>> lived in a dilapidated, unheated, mold and cockroach
>>>> infested apartment, brought charges against their
>>>> Roosevelt Owyang, accusing him of not providing a
>>>> dwelling at the complex. The suit also alleged breach of
>>>> contract. The former tenants stated that rain water leaked
>>>> into their apartments from windows and ceilings so the
>>>> apartments were constantly damp and mold was thick.
>>>> Cockroaches were everywhere, and stairway railings and
>>>> floorboards were often broken. Several plaintiffs claimed
>>>> that they developed asthma along with the 39 former and
>>>> current residents who are party to the suit. Several
>>>> claimed that they suffered from chronic sinusitis and
>>>> respiratory problems as a result of staying at the
>>>> apartment. The complaint was filed in state Superior Court
>>>> in Alameda County. As part of a settlement reached, the
>>>> twelve immigrant families received a $1.3 million payout,
>>>> resolving the lawsuit. [INSIDE BAY AREA: APARTMENT MOLD]
Posts on this thread, including this one