Re: Another Mold Settlement

More | Report Post

Mikey,

That's pathetic. I'm sorry. I don't know how to help you.

ff

On 11/21/07, Mike B. wrote:
> You must be seething with shame and embarrasment. You've posted at least 5 responses to my
> last comments. In your frenzied efforts to cast the spotlight off you, you're even posting
> responses in MY NAME!(more on that in a direct response to that post).
>
> Your second paragraph below says it all. To paraphrase you: "neener, neener, ha, ha. I
> wasn't even talking about that post, silly; I was talking about some other post I can't
> identify because I'm so mad right now." You're sounding like Jon Lovitz character on
> Saturday Night Live, only you ain't funny.
>
> Then, your third paragraph tries to relate back to yet another post in this thread where I
> qualified (i.e. limited) my response therein to "the statement below." Man, you're
> stretching your credibility to the point of transparency.
>
> I knew you couldn't justify your comments from the beginning of this thread to now. How
> could you? You can't. On the one hand, you pontificate that only honest, meaningful and
> positive posts should be allowed on here. In the next breath, you claim you "set me up"
> with some "test." You need to change your identity on here to fickledf.
>
> Again, I presented 2 articles regarding successful mold litigation. You went off on a
> tangent maligning the character of the plaintiffs, plus spouting your insidious beliefs
> about conspiracies by everybody else.
>
> Oh, yeah; stop posting in my name.
>
>
> On 11/21/07, ff wrote:
>>
>> Mike B.:
>>
>> Again, is that a refusal on your part? Also, again, go back and read my posts, the two
>> opposing scenarios, one OR the other, did not represent my thinking, that would be an
>> impossibility as written. Therefore, your intentional misreprentation as "remarks", is
>> not applicable. In fact, you question as to "where I came up with them", reveals that
>> you know neither of the two opposing scenarios does represent my opinion, but only a
>> test for you, that you flunked.
>>
>> I will tell you that it was not that specifc post of yours that I set you up on, but the
>> others, in which you behaved in exactly the same manner you now display. You were the
>> same before, and after, I set you up. My, how you pout and fume, rather than confess.
>> My, how you twist, spin, attack, restate, misinterpret...
>>
>> Rather selective of you, isn't it, what you choose to use, and what you leave out.
>>
>> Now, do you have anything of a contributory nature regarding mold to discuss, or are you
>> here for some other purpose?
>>
>> ff
>>
>> On 11/21/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>> I'm going to give YOU an opportunity to see if you can weasel out of your jealous, and
>>> what I consider racist, remarks to my original post. You tell the world, based on the
>>> information that existed in my original post (which is re-posted below for your
>>> convenience), where you came up with the 2 scenarios you espoused:
>>>
>>> ORIGINAL POST:
>>>
>>> What are ya'll doing wrong with your litigation?
>>>
>>> Apartment Mold
>>> Oakland, CA: (Nov-18-07) Twelve immigrant families who
>>> lived in a dilapidated, unheated, mold and cockroach
>>> infested apartment, brought charges against their landlord,
>>> Roosevelt Owyang, accusing him of not providing a habitable
>>> dwelling at the complex. The suit also alleged breach of
>>> contract. The former tenants stated that rain water leaked
>>> into their apartments from windows and ceilings so the
>>> apartments were constantly damp and mold was thick.
>>> Cockroaches were everywhere, and stairway railings and
>>> floorboards were often broken. Several plaintiffs claimed
>>> that they developed asthma along with the 39 former and
>>> current residents who are party to the suit. Several others
>>> claimed that they suffered from chronic sinusitis and upper-
>>> respiratory problems as a result of staying at the
>>> apartment. The complaint was filed in state Superior Court
>>> in Alameda County. As part of a settlement reached, the
>>> twelve immigrant families received a $1.3 million payout,
>>> resolving the lawsuit. [INSIDE BAY AREA: APARTMENT MOLD]
>>>
>>>
>>> Go ahead, now.....tell us what was contructive and meaningful about your original
>>> response to this post.
>>>
>>> I know you can't justify the jealous, racial profiling. The rest of your response was
>>> simply a page right out of the paranoid, conspiracy playbook you follow.
>>>
>>> Happy Thanksgiving.