Re: Another Mold Settlement
Posted by ff on 11/26/07
Is civility a possibility for Mike B.?
Do you think "something's changed" with regard to microbes, and
IAQ/Toxic Mold problems today?
on 11/26/07, ff wrote:
> Mike B.:
> Where would you like to go with this, your BS, do you have some
> goal/endpoint in mind? What would you really like to
> On 11/23/07, Mike B. wrote:
>> Wow, you're actually trying to impress us by pointing out that
>> Oakland is in Alameda County. From what source material did
>> copy the rest of your blabber that is wholly-unrelated to the
>> article I posted?
>> You're a trip.
>> On 11/22/07, ff wrote:
>>> Alameda County, I always take note of this. It was one of
>>> the areas in the US where problems with systemic fungicides
>>> surfaced early on, to a degree that could not be ignored.
>>> Application there is prohibited on the label, and has been
>>> for decades.
>>> It is my position that documentation pointing out that
>>> fungal resistance was merely an academic concept prior to
>>> the introduction of systemic anti-fungal compounds in the
>>> 70's, sheds light on the question so many ask today - "what
>>> The emerging patterns of resistance, and a shift to
>>> dominance by toxin-producing species, coincides with the
>>> increase in IAQ/Toxic Mold problems today.
>>> On 11/19/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> What are ya'll doing wrong with your litigation?
>>>> Apartment Mold
>>>> Oakland, CA: (Nov-18-07) Twelve immigrant families who
>>>> lived in a dilapidated, unheated, mold and cockroach
>>>> infested apartment, brought charges against their
>>>> Roosevelt Owyang, accusing him of not providing a
>>>> dwelling at the complex. The suit also alleged breach of
>>>> contract. The former tenants stated that rain water leaked
>>>> into their apartments from windows and ceilings so the
>>>> apartments were constantly damp and mold was thick.
>>>> Cockroaches were everywhere, and stairway railings and
>>>> floorboards were often broken. Several plaintiffs claimed
>>>> that they developed asthma along with the 39 former and
>>>> current residents who are party to the suit. Several
>>>> claimed that they suffered from chronic sinusitis and
>>>> respiratory problems as a result of staying at the
>>>> apartment. The complaint was filed in state Superior Court
>>>> in Alameda County. As part of a settlement reached, the
>>>> twelve immigrant families received a $1.3 million payout,
>>>> resolving the lawsuit. [INSIDE BAY AREA: APARTMENT MOLD]
Posts on this thread, including this one