Re: Another Mold Settlement

More | Report Post

No, DA. This started with the subject EVERYONE sees above, including you --
"Another Mold Settlement." Seriously, what's wrong with you?

On 11/26/07, ff wrote:
>
> It's exactly as I thought, you can't take your own medicine. You need
> to go back and read your posts, and see how you have spun around, but
> tell me, as I have asked before, can you get onto a board relevant
> discussion without jumping to wild speculation and without blurting out
> with insulting BS?
>
> This started with a question about cedars, of which I found interesting,
> and asked for more info...and here you are now, asking questions,
> expecting something in others that you're incapable of.
>
> ALameda County? Spontaneous generation? Is that how you think mold
> occured in the apartments? What's changed? Why the increase in toxic
> mold/IAQ problems? Just what do you think is causing it?
>
>
>
> ff
>
> On 11/26/07, Mike B. wrote:
>> This is a simple "yes" or "no" question: Is there anything you've
>> posted on this chatboard that provides your real name and background?
>>
>> On 11/26/07, ff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Not a single word was said, nor has any evidence been offered,
>>> that
>>>> the mold growing in these apartments was the result of some
>>>> pesticide lable prohibitions. As a matter of fact, there is no
>>>> discussion whatsoever about the use of pesticides (which, by
>>>> definition, includes fungicides) to control or abate the growth of
>>>> the mold in these apartments.
>>>
>>> So what?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, what do you mean by your comment "you may want to seek
>>>> professional advice on preservation of capital and investment?"
>>>
>>> So you wouldn't waste your $1.3 million?
>>>
>>>
>>> ff
>>>
>>>