Re: Another Mold Settlement

More | Report Post

Mike B.:

Ok, you're so frustrated, mad and confused that you jump to "DA". Like I
said, I started in on the question regarding cedar trees and allergies.
Your confusion is easy to see, caused by a dose of your own medicine. It
sure didn't take much.

I always give the benefit of doubt, but after this series of exchanges -
keeping in mind that your absurdity with me is typical of what you routinely
display with others - it is obvious that you're not just antagonistic, your
not just acting out... All I had to do was plug in a few prompts, just like
you do, and you went ballistic. You can't take your own medicine.

THE REAL QUESTION IS: Can you conduct board relevant discussion, without
your temper tantrums?

THE CHALLENGE: Pick a relevant subject, or I'll suggest one. How about the
cedars, ubiquity and potential liability - I thought that was a good
question that warranted comment/discussion.

CIVILITY: Now, this does not mean that you can take fragments, fail to read,
misinterpret, re-arrange the fragments to fit into your own little world,
and get completely lost followed by outbursts, tantrums, and child-like name-
calling... And no, I will not set you up or intentionally set you off, that
test for you is over. You flunked.

I look forward to your civil response.

ff

On 11/26/07, Mike B. wrote:
> No, DA. This started with the subject EVERYONE sees above, including you --
> "Another Mold Settlement." Seriously, what's wrong with you?
>

>
> On 11/26/07, ff wrote:
>>
>> It's exactly as I thought, you can't take your own medicine. You need
>> to go back and read your posts, and see how you have spun around, but
>> tell me, as I have asked before, can you get onto a board relevant
>> discussion without jumping to wild speculation and without blurting out
>> with insulting BS?
>>
>> This started with a question about cedars, of which I found interesting,
>> and asked for more info...and here you are now, asking questions,
>> expecting something in others that you're incapable of.
>>
>> ALameda County? Spontaneous generation? Is that how you think mold
>> occured in the apartments? What's changed? Why the increase in toxic
>> mold/IAQ problems? Just what do you think is causing it?
>>
>>
>>
>> ff
>>
>> On 11/26/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>> This is a simple "yes" or "no" question: Is there anything you've
>>> posted on this chatboard that provides your real name and background?
>>>
>>> On 11/26/07, ff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not a single word was said, nor has any evidence been offered,
>>>> that
>>>>> the mold growing in these apartments was the result of some
>>>>> pesticide lable prohibitions. As a matter of fact, there is no
>>>>> discussion whatsoever about the use of pesticides (which, by
>>>>> definition, includes fungicides) to control or abate the growth of
>>>>> the mold in these apartments.
>>>>
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, what do you mean by your comment "you may want to seek
>>>>> professional advice on preservation of capital and investment?"
>>>>
>>>> So you wouldn't waste your $1.3 million?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ff
>>>>
>>>>