Re: Another Mold Settlement

More | Report Post

Mike B.:

This is not my board, so as a compliant person, I try to stay within the
guidelines consistent with civil obedience. Of course, your approach, just
continues to reveal your nature and dissatisfaction with life, yourself, and
humanity. I welcome useful information - why not meet the challenge and offer
some?

ff

On 11/27/07, Mike B. wrote:
> You continue to prove you're delusional and insecure.
>
> You're jealous of the valuable and useful information I post, even though you
> don't like the tone I might have to take in order to get my point through your
> dense and muddled skull. Each and every time I prove you wrong (which is all
> the time), you resort to your childish ways.
>
> You seem to me to be a loner. Your opinion of yourself is not shared by
others.
> You strive to be noticed and authoritative, but your social awkwardness and
> adolescent, know-it-all mannerism only demonstrates your propensity to be a
> shallow alarmist. When people ignore or reject your rants, you get all out of
> sort. When confronted with opposing views, you make inappropriate remarks.
> That's why you're alone.
>
> How could anyone take you seriously? You ignore and lie about the obvious
> (i.e. - your posting using my name). That's a clear indication that you would
> and do skew information in order to fit your personal agenda.
>
> But, enough about you.
>
> The issue with the cedars is best taken up with the person who posted the
> original question to someone other than you. Remember when you butted in with
> your long list of diatribe attempting to become part of the discussion?
>
>
>
> On 11/27/07, ff wrote:
>>
>> Mike B.:
>>
>> Ok, you're so frustrated, mad and confused that you jump to "DA". Like I
>> said, I started in on the question regarding cedar trees and allergies.
>> Your confusion is easy to see, caused by a dose of your own medicine. It
>> sure didn't take much.
>>
>> I always give the benefit of doubt, but after this series of exchanges -
>> keeping in mind that your absurdity with me is typical of what you routinely
>> display with others - it is obvious that you're not just antagonistic, your
>> not just acting out... All I had to do was plug in a few prompts, just like
>> you do, and you went ballistic. You can't take your own medicine.
>>
>> THE REAL QUESTION IS: Can you conduct board relevant discussion, without
>> your temper tantrums?
>>
>> THE CHALLENGE: Pick a relevant subject, or I'll suggest one. How about the
>> cedars, ubiquity and potential liability - I thought that was a good
>> question that warranted comment/discussion.
>>
>> CIVILITY: Now, this does not mean that you can take fragments, fail to read,
>> misinterpret, re-arrange the fragments to fit into your own little world,
>> and get completely lost followed by outbursts, tantrums, and child-like name-
>> calling... And no, I will not set you up or intentionally set you off, that
>> test for you is over. You flunked.
>>
>> I look forward to your civil response.
>>
>> ff
>>