Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff

More | Report Post

johncodie:

Thanks for the interesting, key points/considerations. Excerpts:

On 12/28/07, John Codie wrote:

1.) > If we believed our court system was strictly for
> right and wrong, and truth and lie; we are grossly misinformed.

You hit the reality of it!

2.) For those who
> want to take up the banner and follow a cause you have to be
willing
> to pay the price.

You can say that again!

3.) Your right Frank they do sleep well at night after a glass of
Brandy
> like of the two attorney's on LA LAW. That is up until they get
> caught, and oh those sleepless night we know so well.

And, they do get caught!

>
> jc
>
>
> On 12/15/07, ff wrote:
>>
>> One thing that victims need to keep in mind, is that they live
>> this everyday, 24/7/365. For those causing the problem, it's
>> not personal, it's business, and they go home at night and
>> forget it.
>>
>> ff
>>
>>
>> On 12/15/07, ff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The "words" were in my opinion really stretched beyond the
>>> intent of the author, or worse, and the suit is a stretch as
>>> well. Even more stretching, is that Mike B., or BB, now use
>>> those "words" in their argument to suggest they actually had
>>> some effect, in kids, the beneficiary of Sharon's self-
>>> sacrifice.
>>>
>>> ff
>>>
>>> On 12/15/07, Deborah wrote:
>>>> I believe the term for a statement like that is "excited
>>>> utterance", only in this case it is in writing. While it
>>>> may be an uncomfortable choice of words, there is something
>>>> to be gleaned in it, that is that the people responsible for
>>>> perpetrating this fraud condemned untold numbers of adults
>>>> and children to continue to suffer and die needlessly. Which
>>>> is the greater transgression?
>>>>
>>>> Sharon's true character is apparent to anyone paying a
>>>> modicum of attention, as is any blatant attempt at
>>>> discrediting her by seizing and continually harping on a
>>>> single phrase heatedly churned out for the purpose of
>>>> underlying the gravity of what these people were cavalierly
>>>> doing in this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Ain't happening.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/07, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>> "May your children rot in hell, along with all
>>>>> the other innocent children you are hurting.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would the other innocent children be rotting in hell?