Follow us!

    Re: Recent Report on the Dead Zone

    Posted by ff on 1/31/08

    All about nutrients, as in generic nutrients, as opposed to
    specific chemicals tagged to manufacturers? This is an old
    and worn out damage control strategy alreay applied to
    massive cleanup efforts such as the Everglades.

    ff

    On 1/31/08, Mike B. wrote:
    > Most of Gulf Dead Zone Nutrients Come from Just Nine States
    >
    > RESTON, Virginia, January 30, 2008 (ENS) - Nine states in
    > the Mississippi River Basin contribute the majority of
    > nutrients to the northern Gulf of Mexico, threatening the
    > economic and ecological health of one of the nation's
    > largest and most productive fisheries, according to a
    > federal government report released Wednesday.
    >
    > The states of Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas,
    > Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi make up only one-
    > third of the 31-state Mississippi River drainage area, but
    > contribute more than 75 percent of nitrogen and phosphorus
    > to the Gulf, U.S. Geological Survey, USGS, researchers
    > report.
    >
    > Excess amounts of these nutrients have resulted in a zone
    > of low dissolved oxygen or hypoxia, caused by the growth
    of
    > large amounts of algae. This can stress and cause death in
    > bottom-dwelling organisms in the Gulf, so it is commonly
    > called the dead zone.
    >
    > The study found that agricultural nonpoint sources
    > contribute more than 70 percent of the nitrogen and
    > phosphorus delivered to the Gulf. By comparison, only
    about
    > nine to 12 percent originates from urban sources.
    >
    > Corn and soybean cultivation is the largest contributor of
    > nitrogen to the Gulf. Animal manure on pasture and
    > rangelands and crop cultivation are the largest
    > contributors of phosphorus.
    >
    > These are among the new findings in the
    > report, "Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery
    to
    > the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin," by
    > the U.S. Geological Survey, USGS, published in the
    > journal "Environmental Science and Technology. "
    >
    > "This study is important because it reveals new details
    > about sources of phosphorus," said Richard Alexander, USGS
    > scientist and lead investigator. "The report shows that
    > animal manure on pasture and range lands contribute nearly
    > as much phosphorus as cultivated crops, 37 versus 43
    > percent."
    >
    > The study suggests that phosphorus associated with the
    > wastes of unconfined animals is a much larger source of
    > phosphorus in the Mississippi River Basin than previously
    > recognized. Current animal manure management emphasizes
    > controlling nutrients primarily from confined animal
    > facilities.
    >
    > Delivery of nutrients to the Gulf was found to be highest
    > from watersheds in the central and eastern portions of the
    > Mississippi River Basin that are drained by large, fast
    > flowing rivers with very little natural removal.
    >
    >
    > Runoff entering Fall Creek in Indianapolis, Indiana (Photo
    > by Charles Crawford courtesy USGS)
    > Alexander concludes that nutrient reductions in the Gulf
    > may be most efficiently achieved by managing nutrients in
    > watersheds drained by large rivers.
    >
    > Reservoirs, particularly common in the Tennessee Valley
    and
    > along the Missouri River, are effective at removing
    > phosphorus from watersheds in the Mississippi Basin, but
    > Alexander and his team found that this creates water
    > quality issues in the reservoirs themselves.
    >
    > The joint federal-state Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Task Force
    > is evaluating recommendations by the U.S. Environmental
    > Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board to set
    reduction
    > targets of at least 45 percent for both nitrogen and
    > phosphorus.
    >
    > The targets would be set in an effort to shrink the size
    of
    > the dead zone in half to 5,000 square kilometers by 2015.
    >
    > USGS Associate Director for Water Dr. Robert Hirsch
    > says "on-the-ground" water monitoring is essential to
    > provide credible, comparable data to verify computer
    > modeling predictions across large regions, such as the
    > Mississippi River Basin.
    >
    > Yet surface water quality monitoring stations are
    > disappearing. Only 35 stations exist today, down from
    about
    > 425 stations in the early 1990s, Hirsch said.
    >
    > Hirsch says this study shows that nutrient issues are
    > complex and management of animal and crop production,
    > control of nutrient sources in close proximity to large
    > rivers, and consideration of reservoir effects on
    > phosphorus all are necessary to reduce the nutrient burden
    > flowing in the Mississippi River Basin.
    >
    > Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights
    > reserved.

    Posts on this thread, including this one


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.