Follow us!

    Re: Valentine's Day

    Posted by Sharon on 2/14/08

    Mike B,

    This is not a board I post on. You can look back at the history
    and see that I have not been on this one for over a year. So stop
    feigning ignorance. And also stop writing wild accusations based
    on something you know NOTHING about. I have not failed to turn over
    or withheld any documents I am required to produce... as you are
    IMAGINING in your own little mind. My attorneys were late in
    turning them over, as I had switched attorney. I did not pay a
    sanction. So stop trying to make some big mystery or implication
    that I have ANYTHING to hide out of a few lines you read on the

    I am not kidding. ONE MORE of these types of false, public writings
    by you and I WILL be finding out your identity. What you are
    writing as you cower behind a pseudoname is potentially and legally


    On 2/14/08, Mike B. wrote:
    > "You are wrong with your understanding that I am withholding ANY
    > documents requested of me that I am required to turn over."
    > This sounds like a typical plan to not produce documents because
    > you will claim some sort of privilege, like the attorney-client
    > privilege.
    > Well, they'll only motion the court to have those "privileged"
    > documents reviewed "in camera" by the court. You'll spend a bunch
    > of money on attorney's fees for memoranda in opposition to
    > submitting the documents in camera. You'll lose that argument.
    > You'll then have to produce the documents to the court, or
    > possibly a special master, for their review and determination on
    > privilege.
    > Hint - just because an attorney was copied with your
    > correspondence does not automatically make the document
    > privileged.
    > On 2/14/08, Sharon wrote:
    >> Mike B,
    >> You have reached new lows. I do not appreciate being discussed
    >> on a chat board that I do not even frequent and would not have
    >> known you were posting such garbage were it not specifically
    >> brought to my attention.
    >> You are wrong with your understanding that I am withholding ANY
    >> documents requested of me that I am required to turn over. Nor
    >> is Kelman requesting any such documents. WHAT IS YOUR REAL
    >> IDENTITY?????????? I have had enough of you making false
    >> postings of things you know nothing about in relation to my
    >> litigation with VeriTox.
    >> Sharon
    >> On 2/14/08, Deborah wrote:
    >>> Do you really think that any statement made by Sharon
    >>> regarding alteration of testimony, which the good doc did,
    >>> is as important as the fact that the papers promulgated by
    >>> these people caused harm by downplaying and denying mold
    >>> induced illness from indoor environments?
    >>> An honest question, please keep any answers or comments
    >>> directed to the topic.
    >>> On 2/13/08, Mike B. wrote:
    >>>> Sharon is going to give Bruce Kelman a nice Valentine's
    >>>> gift tomorrow - documents she's been withholding from
    >>>> production. I'll bet there are some treasures amongst them!

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.