Re: Valentine's Day
Posted by Deborah on 2/16/08
On 2/15/08, Mike B. wrote:
Statement: "It was on this same board where you and I were first "introduced" after
you stuck your nose into my discussions with Deborah Davitt." Comment: The fact that he would call the exchanges "discussions" is indicative of
some disassociation with reality. He starts this, disappears, returns and the cycle begins again. This goes beyond lurking.
>
> On 2/15/08, Sharon wrote:
>> To reiterate:
>> On 2/15/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>> Mike B,
>>>>
>>>> That's it. You are NOT correct with the false information you are publicly
>>>> putting out about me, based on nothing but a document you found on the
>>>> internet. And I NEVER post or monitor the ToxTort board. I monitor the
>>>> Black Mold Board. Thank God, someone else does monitor this board and
>>>> alerted me to the malicious lies you are writing about me....once again.
>>>>
>>>> I am not withholding any documents that I am required to turn over. Kelman
>>>> is not requesting any new documents from me.
>>>>
>>>> This is malicious on your part. I have asked you to stop NUMEROUS times.
>>>> Yet, you continue to put out false information, even after being told it is
>>>> false.
>>>>
>>>> I told you exactly what happened. I switched legal counsel and they were
>>>> delayed in turning over documents beyond the date stipulated with the prior
>>>> attorney.
>>>>
>>>> You have chosen to continue to stalk me while remaining annonymous thru a
>>>> pseudoname, yet publicly implying and outright stating that I am lying and
>>>> hiding something, when I am not. Nor have I ever been accused of hiding
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> I have had it with you. No more. That's it. I will be seeking legal
>>>> council on Monday.
>>>>
>>>> Sharon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/08, Sharon wrote:
>>> Mike B,
>>>
>>> Below is the history of this board for the past year. I have not posted on
>>> this bord for over one year until your malicious lies about me, that you have
>>> posted on this board, were brought to my attention.
>>>
>>> Military Housing, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Disinformation tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Important Article, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Diversion tactics, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Valentine's Day, 2/13/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Sharon.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Mike B.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by johncodie.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Sharon.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/14/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Sharon.
>>> Re: Valentine's Day, 2/15/08, by Sharon.
>>>
>>> Camp Lejeune Water Contamination, 2/06/08, by Andrea.
>>> Re: Camp Lejeune Water Contamination, 2/15/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Abstract of Study - Discuss This, 2/05/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Abstract of Study - Discuss This, 2/05/08, by ff.
>>>
>>> Bruce Kelman versus Sharon Kramer - Update, 2/01/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Bruce Kelman versus Sharon Kramer - Update, 2/04/08, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Holy Fungus Batman, 2/01/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Holy Fungus Batman, 2/05/08, by Pauline Phillips.
>>>
>>> Recent Report on the Dead Zone, 1/31/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Recent Report on the Dead Zone, 1/31/08, by ff.
>>>
>>> Ahmedsdsds, 1/27/08, by Ahmedsdsds.
>>>
>>> Update on Camp Lejeune-TFTPTF Website, 1/16/08, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> SLAPP, 1/07/08, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Mold Victim Fighting For Her Life, 1/06/08, by Darlene.
>>>
>>> Katrina Cough Study II, 1/04/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Katrina Cough Study II, 1/04/08, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Katrina Cough Study II, 1/05/08, by ff.
>>>
>>> AIHA Webinar, 1/02/08, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Threats and Intimidation, 12/13/07, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Sharon Kramer Legal Opinion, 12/13/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Sharon Kramer Legal Opinion, 12/14/07, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> TO: ff, Myco, Sharon Kramer, Deborah, v, et al., 12/11/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: TO: ff, Myco, Sharon Kramer, Deborah, v, et al., 12/11/07, by ff.
>>> Re: TO: ff, Myco, Sharon Kramer, Deborah, v, et al., 12/11/07, by v.
>>> Re: TO: ff, Myco, Sharon Kramer, Deborah, v, et al., 12/12/07, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> May Your Children Rot in Hell - Sharon Kramer, 12/11/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: May Your Children Rot in Hell - Sharon Kramer, 12/15/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: May Your Children Rot in Hell - Sharon Kramer, 12/15/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff, 12/15/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff, 12/28/07, by John Codie.
>>> Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff, 12/28/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff, 12/28/07, by Johncodie.
>>> Re: Your opponents rest ? - ff, 12/28/07, by ff.
>>>
>>> FEMA and Moldy Trailers, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Mold Litigation News, 11/20/07, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Another Mold Settlement, 11/19/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/20/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/21/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/22/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/23/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/23/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/23/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/26/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/27/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/28/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Another Mold Settlement, 11/28/07, by ff.
>>>
>>> Ferry Mold, 11/19/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Ferry Mold, 11/19/07, by ff.
>>>
>>> Screening, 11/08/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Screening, 11/08/07, by Boogieman.
>>> Re: Screening, 11/09/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Screening, 11/09/07, by johncodie.
>>>
>>> [deleted], 10/23/07, by Anitymncani.
>>>
>>> CAMP LEJEUNE WATER CONTAMINATION, 10/12/07, by Andrea.
>>>
>>> NY-Toxic Materials found inside my apartment, 10/09/07, by marie.
>>> Re: NY-Toxic Materials found inside my apartment, 10/24/07, by Johncodie.
>>> Re: NY-Toxic Materials found inside my apartment, 11/02/07, by johncodie.
>>>
>>> name, 9/26/07, by name.
>>>
>>> Help the webmaster help you with spam, 9/16/07, by Bob Reap (webmaster).
>>>
>>> At Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune between 1957 and 1987?, 9/05/07, by Andrea.
>>>
>>> Sporicidin and Bleach, 8/26/07, by Rick Kurland.
>>> Re: Sporicidin and Bleach, 8/27/07, by RemDude.
>>> Re: Sporicidin and Bleach, 8/30/07, by John Code.
>>> Re: Sporicidin and Bleach, 10/26/07, by jim.
>>>
>>> Camp Lejeune's water blamed for ills, 6/12/07, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> Canned Foods, 5/17/07, by Mike B..
>>>
>>> Chromium Linked To Cancer Says NIH, 5/17/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Chromium Linked To Cancer Says NIH, 6/19/07, by M Bob Mean.
>>>
>>> Would like to discover you were living in this toxic soup?, 5/15/07, by Angel.
>>> Re: Would like to discover you were living in this toxic sou, 5/16/07, by cj.
>>> Re: Would like to discover you were living in this toxic sou, 6/12/07, by
>>> Angel.
>>>
>>> Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by johncodie.
>>> Re: Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by johncodie.
>>> Re: Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by ff.
>>> Re: Toxic Mold? Limitations uncovered..., 5/15/07, by johncodie.
>>>
>>> Olen Properties HIde Mold Severity in Vegas, 5/14/07, by Angel.
>>> Re: Olen Properties HIde Mold Severity in Vegas, 5/17/07, by Arch.
>>>
>>> MORGELLON'S DISEASE...IS MOLD, 4/24/07, by standswfist.
>>> Re: MORGELLON'S DISEASE...IS MOLD, 5/07/07, by John Lloyd.
>>> Re: MORGELLON'S DISEASE...IS MOLD, 6/04/07, by cb thomas.
>>>
>>> Victim's of Toxic Mold, 4/22/07, by Darlene.
>>>
>>> Tort Tax..., 4/11/07, by Rem Dude.
>>>
>>> Rights violated? Need to get coverage?, 4/06/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Rights violated? Need to get coverage?, 4/11/07, by Mike B..
>>> Re: Rights violated? I apologize for pushing this site., 4/25/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Rights violated? I apologize for pushing this site., 4/25/07, by Holt
>>> Harrison.
>>> Re: Rights violated? I apologize for pushing this site., 4/25/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Tram aka Holt Harrison, 4/25/07, by Deborah.
>>> Re: Tram aka Holt Harrison, 4/25/07, by Holt "Tram" Harrison.
>>> Re: Tram aka Holt Harrison, 4/25/07, by M3.
>>> Re: Tram aka Holt Harrison, 4/26/07, by Deborah.
>>>
>>> CDC, OSHA Connection, 4/05/07, by Johncodie.
>>>
>>> Instant action form to send issues to Congress in real time!, 3/26/07, by s.
>>>
>>> CONTACT CONGRESS, 3/25/07, by s.
>>> Re: CONTACT CONGRESS [home page], 3/25/07, by s.
>>>
>>> "TWO FACES OF TOXIC MOLD", 3/23/07, by s.
>>> Re: "TWO FACES OF TOXIC MOLD", 3/23/07, by s.
>>> Re: site=response/papers=senate-congress Re: "TWO FACES OF TOXIC, 3/24/07, by
>>> s.
>>> Re: "TWO FACES OF TOXIC MOLD", 4/06/07, by luke Brennan.
>>>
>>> Killer in recalled pet food may be mold, FDA says, 3/22/07, by s.
>>>
>>> Mold Exposure Question, 3/03/07, by Kathy W..
>>>
>>> MOLD-WALTER REED INVESTIGATION, 2/21/07, by s.
>>>
>>> FEN-Neurotoxic/Valve Case, 2/20/07, by Scott.
>>>
>>> contact dermatitis due to hexavalent chromium, 2/15/07, by leslie kelly.
>>>
>>> Ira Besserman I do know Dr. Lipsey, and Dr. Thrasher, 2/12/07, by CS.
>>> Re: Ira Besserman I do know Dr. Lipsey, and Dr. Thrasher, 2/12/07, by
>>> johncodie.
>>>
>>> Boston Society for Advanced Therapeutics/ Angle, 1/26/07, by John Codie.
>>> Re: Boston Society for Advanced Therapeutics/ Angle, 1/26/07, by Angel.
>>> Re: Boston Society for Advanced Therapeutics/ Angle, 1/27/07, by johncodie.
>>> Re: Boston Society for Advanced Therapeutics/ Angle, 1/27/07, by Irritated.
>>> Re: Boston Society for Advanced Therapeutics/ Angle, 1/28/07, by johncodie.
>>>
>>> Public Relations Employee for SMExperts, 1/25/07, by johncodie.
>>>
>>> Canad Posits Mold Guidelines, 1/25/07, by MBobMean.
>>> Re: Canada Posits Mold Guidelines, 1/25/07, by MBobMean.
>>> Re: Canada Posits Mold Guidelines, 1/25/07, by Sharon.
>>>
>>> Pres of ACOEM responds to WSJ Article, 1/24/07, by Sharon Kramer.
>>> Re: Pres of ACOEM responds to WSJ Article, 1/25/07, by MBobMean.
>>> Re: More Pres of ACOEM responds to WSJ Article, 1/25/07, by Sharon.
>>> Re: Pres of ACOEM responds to WSJ Article, 1/25/07, by Sharon.
>>> Re: Pres of ACOEM responds to WSJ Article, 1/29/07, by MBobMean.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/15/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>> As posted by Mike B, that is inflammatory and false:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/13/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharon is going to give Bruce Kelman a nice Valentine's
>>>>>>>>>>>> gift tomorrow - documents she's been withholding from
>>>>>>>>>>>> production. I'll bet there are some treasures amongst them!
>>>>
>>>> Re: Bruce Kelman versus Sharon Kramer - Update
>>>> Posted by Mike B. on 2/04/08
>>>>
>>>> Really, Sharon, what's the problem with your discovery
>>>> responses? Are you withholding production of documents that
>>>> have been requested or subpoenaed? What kind of documents are
>>>> being sought by Kelman? Will those documents help him in his
>>>> suit against you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And by the way, you should take your own advice and READ the entire appellate
>>>> ruling.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As appellant, Kramer has the burden of showing error. (See
>>>> Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount Stores (1995) 10 Cal.4th
>>>> 424, 443.) “The reviewing court is not required to make an
>>>> independent, unassisted study of the record in search of
>>>> error or grounds to support the judgment. It is entitled to
>>>> the assistance of counsel.” (9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (4th
>>>> ed. 1997) Appeal, § 594, p. 627.) We may ignore points that
>>>> are not argued or supported by citations to authorities or
>>>> the record. ( Kim v. Sumitomo Bank (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th
>>>> 974, 979.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ......We decline to sift through the
>>>> record for her exhibits to see if any error might have
>>>> occurred.
>>>>
>>>> Sharon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/15/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> Mike B,
>>>>>
>>>>> That's it. You are NOT correct with the false information you are publicly
>>>>> putting out about me, based on nothing but a document you found on the
>>>>> internet. And I NEVER post or monitor the ToxTort board. I monitor the
>>>>> Black Mold Board. Thank God, someone else does monitor this board and
>>>>> alerted me to the malicious lies you are writing about me....once again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not withholding any documents that I am required to turn over. Kelman
>>>>> is not requesting any new documents from me.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is malicious on your part. I have asked you to stop NUMEROUS times.
>>>>> Yet, you continue to put out false information, even after being told it is
>>>>> false.
>>>>>
>>>>> I told you exactly what happened. I switched legal counsel and they were
>>>>> delayed in turning over documents beyond the date stipulated with the prior
>>>>> attorney.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have chosen to continue to stalk me while remaining annonymous thru a
>>>>> pseudoname, yet publicly implying and outright stating that I am lying and
>>>>> hiding something, when I am not. Nor have I ever been accused of hiding
>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have had it with you. No more. That's it. I will be seeking legal
>>>>> council on Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sharon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/15/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>> Well, I guess we know who is right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about this. I'll provide you with information on just one of the ways
>>>>>> to see it for yourself. Go to the San Diego Superior Court web page and
>>>>>> find the "civil cases" and then the "tentative rulings" link. Click on
>>>>>> that and you will be asked to provide a case number. Type in "GIN044539"
>>>>>> and you will see the latest ruling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/15/08, Deborah wrote:
>>>>>>> You are just so sweet. If you have this info, why not just post it
>>>>>>> since you claim it is factual?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/14/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>>> According to my computer, this post is and always was included on the
>>>>>>>> ToxBoard Chatboard where Sharon Kramer has posted regularly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have not posted any "types of false, public writings" or
>>>>>>>> anything "potentially and legally libelous."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A few simple answers by you to a few simple questions might clear
>>>>>>>> this up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) Did the court (San Diego Superior) presiding over your litigation
>>>>>>>> (Kelman v. Kramer) issue an order (or "ruling") in November or
>>>>>>>> December 2007 that required you to provide answers and documents to
>>>>>>>> the plaintiff (Kelman)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) Did that same court award sanctions to the plaintiff in that same
>>>>>>>> order/ruling?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3) Did the same court grant your motion for reconsideration of it's
>>>>>>>> November or December order/ruling?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4) Did the same court modify its November or December order/ruling to
>>>>>>>> allow you to raise the attorney-client privilege as a response to the
>>>>>>>> document and information requests?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5) Did the same court uphold the remainder of its previous November
>>>>>>>> or December order/ruling, including its previous award of sanctions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6) Did the same court, in its amended order/ruling of January 25,
>>>>>>>> 2008, deny your request for sanctions (somewhere over $5,000+)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7) Did the same court, in its amended order, require you to provide
>>>>>>>> your responses/production of documents/objections to the plaintiff
>>>>>>>> within 20 days of the date of the amended order (1/25/2008)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/14/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mike B,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is not a board I post on. You can look back at the history
>>>>>>>>> and see that I have not been on this one for over a year. So stop
>>>>>>>>> feigning ignorance. And also stop writing wild accusations based
>>>>>>>>> on something you know NOTHING about. I have not failed to turn over
>>>>>>>>> or withheld any documents I am required to produce... as you are
>>>>>>>>> IMAGINING in your own little mind. My attorneys were late in
>>>>>>>>> turning them over, as I had switched attorney. I did not pay a
>>>>>>>>> sanction. So stop trying to make some big mystery or implication
>>>>>>>>> that I have ANYTHING to hide out of a few lines you read on the
>>>>>>>>> internet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not kidding. ONE MORE of these types of false, public writings
>>>>>>>>> by you and I WILL be finding out your identity. What you are
>>>>>>>>> writing as you cower behind a pseudoname is potentially and legally
>>>>>>>>> libelous.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sharon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "You are wrong with your understanding that I am withholding ANY
>>>>>>>>>> documents requested of me that I am required to turn over."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This sounds like a typical plan to not produce documents because
>>>>>>>>>> you will claim some sort of privilege, like the attorney-client
>>>>>>>>>> privilege.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, they'll only motion the court to have those "privileged"
>>>>>>>>>> documents reviewed "in camera" by the court. You'll spend a bunch
>>>>>>>>>> of money on attorney's fees for memoranda in opposition to
>>>>>>>>>> submitting the documents in camera. You'll lose that argument.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You'll then have to produce the documents to the court, or
>>>>>>>>>> possibly a special master, for their review and determination on
>>>>>>>>>> privilege.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hint - just because an attorney was copied with your
>>>>>>>>>> correspondence does not automatically make the document
>>>>>>>>>> privileged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike B,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You have reached new lows. I do not appreciate being discussed
>>>>>>>>>>> on a chat board that I do not even frequent and would not have
>>>>>>>>>>> known you were posting such garbage were it not specifically
>>>>>>>>>>> brought to my attention.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are wrong with your understanding that I am withholding ANY
>>>>>>>>>>> documents requested of me that I am required to turn over. Nor
>>>>>>>>>>> is Kelman requesting any such documents. WHAT IS YOUR REAL
>>>>>>>>>>> IDENTITY?????????? I have had enough of you making false
>>>>>>>>>>> postings of things you know nothing about in relation to my
>>>>>>>>>>> litigation with VeriTox.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sharon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/08, Deborah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you really think that any statement made by Sharon
>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding alteration of testimony, which the good doc did,
>>>>>>>>>>>> is as important as the fact that the papers promulgated by
>>>>>>>>>>>> these people caused harm by downplaying and denying mold
>>>>>>>>>>>> induced illness from indoor environments?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> An honest question, please keep any answers or comments
>>>>>>>>>>>> directed to the topic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharon is going to give Bruce Kelman a nice Valentine's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gift tomorrow - documents she's been withholding from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> production. I'll bet there are some treasures amongst them!
Posts on this thread, including this one
|
1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.