Re: Valentine's Day
Posted by Sharon on 2/20/08
I am not certain where you get some of your wild ideas, but much of stuff you put out is vastly
incorrect. I can't even follow why you would think some of this.
You are 1000% incorrect with your evaluation of the matter. The ONLY five words in question within
the press release, that PRWeb published for me, are "altered his under oath statements". That's all.
I am not kidding.
You can read Kelman's testimony at moldwarrriors.com
I interviewed 4 people before I wrote. Dr. Kelman altered his description of the relationship of the
ACOEM paper and the MI paper a few times, once he was forced to discuss them in front of a jury, by
the Kilian transcript being allowed into the record.
Have you even read his testimony?????
On 2/20/08, johncodie wrote:
> Sharon: The quotation is not limited to five small words, you were requested to write as a guest
> columist; as you were recognized as an out spoken advocate. You named the individual by name and
> accussed the individual of a action that is not supported to the court of record, and to be
> verified to the fact in the court you are accused of the false information. You provided a title,or
> association name behind your public name, where you proceeded to provide a telephone number. As
> any journalist, or writter, you failed to get an accurate quote of the man, and acted as your own
> editor in submitting the accusations. The intent of this publication and its uses on the internet
> would have been recognized by others as defamation, as make the statement of facts without the
> words ever, making any admission to fact of the attorny's accusation. A person is innocent until
> proven guilty. I am glad you will have your in court and continue the legal battle. The
> defamation court could probably care less about the side bar issues of mold. When you typed the
> lines and knew those were not the man's words of records, and sent the send button; did you have
> intentions of causing him harm? Either producet the records subpeonead or seek a settlment. In
> the game of life, its called a cheap shot on eiter side of the field. It is not factal, of if it
> is get on with it and prove it in court.
> On 2/17/08, Sharon wrote:
>> Not true. I switched attorneys back mid-summer. I now have attorneys who specialize in libel.
>> Should have done this in the first place. And I have no problem being exposed to the public eye
>> as you say. Not my favorite thing to do, but it is necessary to move this issue forward and
>> remove the deceit from the mold issue.
>> What I DO have a problem with, are people interpreting what is happening in my life and my case
>> who have no clue what they are talking about. Like you just now, concluding there is a
>> problem...when there is not and Mike B putting out absolute lies that I would be turning over
>> documents I was supposedly withholding on the 14th of February. That was PURE garbage, made up
>> in his own little mind. So, I could care less what people say about this case as long as they
>> have their facts straight. I wrote the truth and stand by it.
>> If you are going to write, get your facts straight before writing. Which both you and Mike B
>> have not done.
>> All is going well. Please THINK before you write about my life.
Posts on this thread, including this one